BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37462079)

  • 1. A review and evaluation of orthodontic brackets, molar bands and orthodontic auxiliaries during orthognathic surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    van Ommeren RM; van Riet TC; Ho JT; Jonkman RE; Becking AG
    J Orthod; 2024 Mar; 51(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 37462079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment.
    Millett DT; Mandall NA; Mattick RC; Hickman J; Glenny AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 2(2):CD008236. PubMed ID: 28230910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesives for bonded molar tubes during fixed brace treatment.
    Millett DT; Mandall NA; Mattick RC; Hickman J; Glenny AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Jun; (6):CD008236. PubMed ID: 21678375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incidence of bracket failure during orthognathic surgery: a comparison of two techniques to establish interim maxillomandibular fixation.
    Attishia R; Van Sickels JE; Cunningham LL
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 19(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 25260536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Different Bracket's Resistance to Torsional Forces from Archwire.
    Khanapure CC; Ayesha S; Sam G; Kumar VJ; Deepika C; Ahmed H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):564-7. PubMed ID: 27595723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
    De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Survival analysis of brackets and tubes: A twelve-month assessment.
    Jung MH
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1034-40. PubMed ID: 24665886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forces in the presence of ceramic versus stainless steel brackets with unconventional vs conventional ligatures.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Camporesi M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 18193950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of ceramic and stainless steel brackets on the notching of archwires during clinical treatment.
    Articolo LC; Kusy K; Saunders CR; Kusy RP
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Aug; 22(4):409-25. PubMed ID: 11029830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of a common stainless steel orthodontic bracket on the diagnostic quality of cranial and cervical 3T- MR images: a prospective, case-control study.
    Cassetta M; Pranno N; Stasolla A; Orsogna N; Fierro D; Cavallini C; Cantisani V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2017 Aug; 46(6):20170051. PubMed ID: 28452576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.
    Reimann S; Bourauel C; Weber A; Dirk C; Lietz T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jul; 77(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 27142040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
    Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.
    Archambault A; Lacoursiere R; Badawi H; Major PW; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 19852662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of fine particle shot peening on surface friction of stainless steel and ceramic bracket slots.
    Tribumrungsuk P; Khantachawana A; Janyaprasert K
    Dent Mater J; 2022 Oct; 41(5):682-687. PubMed ID: 35644570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.