These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37462175)

  • 1. Dual-process moral judgment beyond fast and slow.
    Greene JD
    Behav Brain Sci; 2023 Jul; 46():e123. PubMed ID: 37462175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.
    Bostyn DH; De Keersmaecker J; Van Assche J; Roets A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):392-397. PubMed ID: 31898259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
    Kahane G
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Switching Tracks? Towards a Multidimensional Model of Utilitarian Psychology.
    Everett JAC; Kahane G
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 Feb; 24(2):124-134. PubMed ID: 31911126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liberating reason from the passions: overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal.
    Feinberg M; Willer R; Antonenko O; John OP
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jul; 23(7):788-95. PubMed ID: 22636202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How Large Is the Role of Emotion in Judgments of Moral Dilemmas?
    Horne Z; Powell D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0154780. PubMed ID: 27385365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer effects between moral dilemmas: a causal model theory.
    Wiegmann A; Waldmann MR
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 24440432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
    Haidt J
    Psychol Rev; 2001 Oct; 108(4):814-34. PubMed ID: 11699120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
    Bago B; De Neys W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural evidence for moral intuition and the temporal dynamics of interactions between emotional processes and moral cognition.
    Gui DY; Gan T; Liu C
    Soc Neurosci; 2016; 11(4):380-94. PubMed ID: 26286634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of analytic and experiential modes of thought on moral judgment.
    Kvaran T; Nichols S; Sanfey A
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():187-96. PubMed ID: 23317833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rational, emotional, or both? Subcomponents of psychopathy predict opposing moral decisions.
    Hauser NC; Neumann CS; Marshall J; Mokros A
    Behav Sci Law; 2021 Oct; 39(5):541-566. PubMed ID: 34672023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Throwing a bomb on a person versus throwing a person on a bomb: intervention myopia in moral intuitions.
    Waldmann MR; Dieterich JH
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 17444922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.
    Dubljević V; Sattler S; Racine E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0204631. PubMed ID: 30273370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The rat-a-gorical imperative: Moral intuition and the limits of affective learning.
    Greene JD
    Cognition; 2017 Oct; 167():66-77. PubMed ID: 28343626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. With a clean conscience: cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments.
    Schnall S; Benton J; Harvey S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1219-22. PubMed ID: 19121126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.
    Greene JD; Sommerville RB; Nystrom LE; Darley JM; Cohen JD
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5537):2105-8. PubMed ID: 11557895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in reliance on intuition predict harsher moral judgments.
    Ward SJ; King LA
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 May; 114(5):825-849. PubMed ID: 28627916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive parallels between moral judgment and modal judgment.
    Shtulman A; Tong L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Dec; 20(6):1327-35. PubMed ID: 23580365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.