BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37462996)

  • 1. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy of nonmetastatic pT4a colorectal cancer: a propensity score analysis.
    Guo HL; Chen JY; Tang YZ; Zeng QL; Jian QL; Li MZ; He YL; Wu WH
    Int J Surg; 2023 Nov; 109(11):3294-3302. PubMed ID: 37462996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When Less Is More: Minimally Invasive Surgery Compared with Laparotomy for Interval Debulking After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with Advanced Ovarian Cancer.
    Brown J; Drury L; Crane EK; Anderson WE; Tait DL; Higgins RV; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):902-909. PubMed ID: 30240899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
    Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real-world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017.
    Guo C; Tang X; Meng Y; Zhang Y; Zhang X; Guo J; Lei X; Qiu J; Hua K
    Cancer Med; 2020 Aug; 9(16):5908-5921. PubMed ID: 32628356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].
    Wu X; Sun LD; Wang M; Zhang P; Yang ZL; Liang H; Tao KX; Cao H; Xu WT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 23(9):888-895. PubMed ID: 32927514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oncological outcomes following minimally invasive surgery for pathological N2M0 colorectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Mori S; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Nomura M; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Asian J Endosc Surg; 2022 Oct; 15(4):781-793. PubMed ID: 35715936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of minimally invasive surgery versus open approach in patients with early-stage uterine carcinosarcomas: a retrospective multicentric study.
    Corrado G; Ciccarone F; Cosentino F; Legge F; Rosati A; Arcieri M; Turco LC; Certelli C; Federico A; Vizza E; Fanfani F; Scambia G; Ferrandina G
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2021 Mar; 147(3):845-852. PubMed ID: 32880752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M
    BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of minimally invasive and open colorectal resections for patients undergoing simultaneous R0 resection for liver metastases: a propensity score analysis.
    Lin Q; Ye Q; Zhu D; Wei Y; Ren L; Zheng P; Xu P; Ye L; Lv M; Fan J; Xu J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Mar; 30(3):385-95. PubMed ID: 25503803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy as an Oncologically safe alternative for patients with stage T4 Colon Cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study.
    Wang H; Chen X; Liu H; Mou T; Deng H; Zhao L; Li G
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Apr; 18(1):370. PubMed ID: 29615004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of antithrombotic agents on short-term outcomes following minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Nomura M; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 May; 37(5):1049-1062. PubMed ID: 35411471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
    He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for serosa-positive (pT4a) gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis.
    Li Z; Liu Y; Hao Y; Bai B; Yu D; Zhao Q
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Mar; 28():167-173. PubMed ID: 30851895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of prior abdominal surgery on short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Sueda T; Tei M; Nishida K; Yoshikawa Y; Matsumura T; Koga C; Miyagaki H; Tsujie M; Akamaru Y; Hasegawa J
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4429-4441. PubMed ID: 34716479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.