These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

34 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37463143)

  • 1. Garden-path sentences and the diversity of their (mis)representations.
    Ceháková M; Chromý J
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288817. PubMed ID: 37463143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lingering misinterpretations in garden-path sentences: evidence from a paraphrasing task.
    Patson ND; Darowski ES; Moon N; Ferreira F
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 19210099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger.
    Christianson K; Hollingworth A; Halliwell JF; Ferreira F
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Jun; 42(4):368-407. PubMed ID: 11368528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. When and where did it happen? Systematic differences in recall of core and optional sentence information.
    Chromý J; Vojvodić S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):111-132. PubMed ID: 36786323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid syntactic adaptation in self-paced reading: Detectable, but only with many participants.
    Prasad G; Linzen T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1156-1172. PubMed ID: 34472920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When readers fail to form a coherent representation of garden-path sentences.
    Chromý J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jan; 75(1):169-190. PubMed ID: 34289762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing of ellipsis with garden-path antecedents in French and German: Evidence from eye tracking.
    Paape D; Hemforth B; Vasishth S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198620. PubMed ID: 29897956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why reread? Evidence from garden-path and local coherence structures.
    Christianson K; Luke SG; Hussey EK; Wochna KL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1380-1405. PubMed ID: 27150840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Persistence of Initial Misanalysis With No Referential Ambiguity.
    Nakamura C; Arai M
    Cogn Sci; 2016 May; 40(4):909-40. PubMed ID: 26190480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What is it that lingers? Garden-path (mis)interpretations in younger and older adults.
    Malyutina S; den Ouden DB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):880-906. PubMed ID: 25920901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reanalysis and semantic persistence in native and non-native garden-path recovery.
    Jacob G; Felser C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):907-25. PubMed ID: 25397360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.