These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37463484)

  • 61. Use of porcine acellular dermal matrix in revisionary cosmetic breast augmentation.
    Pozner JN; White JB; Newman MI
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 Jul; 33(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 23813397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Impact of breast dimension in one-stage augmentation mastopexies on implant selection: review of 103 consecutive breast augmentations with nanotextured silicone implants].
    Lam MC; Vorhold J; Pech T; Wefers N; Kalff JC; Walgenbach KJ
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2021 Apr; 53(2):130-143. PubMed ID: 33860491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Revision augmentation mastopexy: indications, operations, and outcomes.
    Spear SL; Low M; Ducic I
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Dec; 51(6):540-6. PubMed ID: 14646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Achieving predictability in augmentation mastopexy.
    Beale EW; Ramanadham S; Harrison B; Rasko Y; Armijo B; Rohrich RJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):284e-292e. PubMed ID: 24572873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The Triple Plane, the Bra-Flap, and the Inverted Bra-Flap Modified Dual Plane Techniques for Breast Augmentation.
    Bracaglia R; Servillo M; Fortunato R; Gentileschi S
    Aesthet Surg J; 2020 Mar; 40(4):NP141-NP151. PubMed ID: 31150054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: a review of 440 consecutive patients.
    Lista F; Tutino R; Khan A; Ahmad J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 23584627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: a technique for maximum en bloc skin resection using the inverted-T pattern regardless of implant size, asymmetry, or ptosis.
    Eisenberg T
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 36(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 21853404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The Medial Pillar Island Flap for Oncoplastic Breast Reconstruction of Upper Pole Defects.
    Akyurek M; Tomczyk E; Albert M; Quinlan R
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Apr; 82(4):375-381. PubMed ID: 30557184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Prepectoral versus Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Comparison of Outcomes.
    Talwar AA; Lanni MA; Ryan IA; Kodali P; Bernstein E; McAuliffe PB; Broach RB; Serletti JM; Butler PD; Fosnot J
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Feb; 153(2):281e-290e. PubMed ID: 37159266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. One stage mastopexy augmentation in the ptotic patient. The superiorly based dermal flap for autologous reinforcement of the inferior pole.
    Ross GL
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Sep; 68(9):1248-54. PubMed ID: 26049611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Acellular dermal matrix for the treatment and prevention of implant-associated breast deformities.
    Spear SL; Seruya M; Clemens MW; Teitelbaum S; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 21088648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Prospective comparative clinical evaluation of 784 consecutive cases of breast augmentation and vertical mammaplasty, performed individually and in combination.
    Swanson E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jul; 132(1):30e-45e. PubMed ID: 23806952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Superior Pedicle Mammaplasty without Parenchymal Incisions after Massive Weight Loss.
    D'Aniello C; Cuomo R; Grimaldi L; Brandi C; Sisti A; Tassinari J; Nisi G
    J Invest Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(6):410-420. PubMed ID: 27780374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Surgical outcomes and nipple projection using the modified skate flap for nipple-areolar reconstruction in a series of 422 implant reconstructions.
    Zhong T; Antony A; Cordeiro P
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 May; 62(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19387168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Autoaugmentation mastopexy with an inferior-based pedicle.
    Hönig JF; Frey HP; Hasse FM; Hasselberg J
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 May; 33(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19225831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Staying Out of Double-Bubble and Bottoming-Out Deformities in Dual-Plane Breast Augmentation: Anatomical and Clinical Study.
    Salgarello M; Visconti G
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Oct; 41(5):999-1006. PubMed ID: 28656352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reduced capsular contracture with smooth and textured breast implants following submuscular mammoplasty: systematic literature review.
    Zhu L; Zhu J; Qian Y; Jiang H
    Future Oncol; 2021 Dec; 17(36):5177-5187. PubMed ID: 34730405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A stacked technique of mastopexy: volume redistribution mastopexy with inferior flap and superomedially based pedicle.
    Kelemen N; Kannan RY; Offer GJ
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 37(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 23397060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The influence of a previous implant-based breast reconstruction on postoperative sensation of the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap.
    van Rooij JAF; Bijkerk E; van der Hulst RRJW; Tuinder SMH
    Breast Cancer; 2024 May; 31(3):456-466. PubMed ID: 38580855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Capsular contracture rate in a low-risk population after primary augmentation mammaplasty.
    Blount AL; Martin MD; Lineberry KD; Kettaneh N; Alfonso DR
    Aesthet Surg J; 2013 May; 33(4):516-21. PubMed ID: 23636624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.