BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37464350)

  • 1. Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Kitayama K; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 Jul; 23(1):205. PubMed ID: 37464350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.
    Pla-Martí V; Martín-Arévalo J; Moro-Valdezate D; García-Botello S; Mora-Oliver I; Gadea-Mateo R; Cozar-Lozano C; Espí-Macías A
    Tech Coloproctol; 2021 Mar; 25(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 32914268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-row versus two-row circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched analysis of the iCral 2 and 3 prospective cohorts.
    Catarci M; Guadagni S; Masedu F; Ruffo G; Viola MG; Borghi F; Baldazzi G; Scatizzi M;
    Int J Surg; 2023 Aug; 109(8):2312-2323. PubMed ID: 37195782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
    Vignali A; Gozzini L; Gasparini G; Calef R; Rosati R; Elmore U
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Aug; 38(1):211. PubMed ID: 37561203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of the polyglycolic acid sheet for preventing anastomotic leakage in double-stapling technique anastomosis for left-sided colon or rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study.
    Shibutani M; Fukuoka T; Iseki Y; Kasashima H; Maeda K
    BMC Surg; 2023 May; 23(1):135. PubMed ID: 37198625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial clinical experience with a powered circular stapler for colorectal anastomosis.
    Atallah S; Kural S; Banda N; Banda A; Bawaney F; Cabral F; Neychev V; Patel C; Larach S
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 May; 24(5):479-486. PubMed ID: 32193667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short-term outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for rectal reconstructions: a retrospective study comparing it to manual circular staplers using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis.
    Matsuhashi N; Tajima JY; Yokoi R; Kiyama S; Endo M; Sato Y; Kuno M; Hayashi H; Asai R; Fukada M; Yasufuku I; Tanaka Y; Okumura N; Murase K; Ishihara T; Takahashi T
    BMC Surg; 2023 Oct; 23(1):332. PubMed ID: 37898761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of a new triple-row circular stapler in reducing the risk of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A historical control and propensity score-matched study.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ishizaki T; Fukushima N; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Jul; 101(27):e29325. PubMed ID: 35801763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.
    Wang T; Sadowsky M; Blakney R; Coplan P; Petraiuolo W; Soberman M; Tomaszewski J; Rene L; Wood J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Nov; 38(1):264. PubMed ID: 37932486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of multiple stapler firings used for rectal division on colorectal anastomotic leak rate.
    Braunschmid T; Hartig N; Baumann L; Dauser B; Herbst F
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5318-5326. PubMed ID: 28634627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Nekliudov NA; Tsarkov PV; Tulina IA
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jun; 98(24):e15978. PubMed ID: 31192938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.
    Sylla P; Sagar P; Johnston SS; Dwarakanathan HR; Waggoner JR; Schwiers M; Roy S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2541-2553. PubMed ID: 34031743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-life introduction of powered circular stapler for esophagogastric anastomosis: cohort and propensity matched score study.
    Vanstraelen S; Coosemans W; Depypere L; Mandeville Y; Moons J; Van Veer H; Nafteux P
    Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 36222069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anastomotic complications after laparoscopic total gastrectomy with esophagojejunostomy constructed by circular stapler (OrVil
    Kawamura H; Ohno Y; Ichikawa N; Yoshida T; Homma S; Takahashi M; Taketomi A
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Dec; 31(12):5175-5182. PubMed ID: 28488177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
    Nagaoka T; Yamaguchi T; Nagasaki T; Akiyoshi T; Nagayama S; Fukunaga Y; Chino A; Ishizuka N; Konishi T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2021 Aug; 64(8):937-945. PubMed ID: 33951685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.
    Herzig DO; Ogilvie JW; Chudzinski A; Ferrara A; Ashraf SQ; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Van der Speeten K; Kinross J; Schimmelpenning H; Sagar PM; Cannon JA; Schwiers ML; Singleton DW; Waggoner JR; Fryrear R; Sylla P
    Int J Surg; 2020 Dec; 84():140-146. PubMed ID: 33176211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Novel Predictive Model for Anastomotic Leakage in Colorectal Cancer Using Auto-artificial Intelligence.
    Mazaki J; Katsumata K; Ohno Y; Udo R; Tago T; Kasahara K; Kuwabara H; Enomoto M; Ishizaki T; Nagakawa Y; Tsuchida A
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Nov; 41(11):5821-5825. PubMed ID: 34732457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comprehensive literature review of the outcome, modifications, and alternatives to double-stapled low pelvic colorectal anastomosis.
    Emile SH; Barsom SH; Elfallal AH; Wexner SD
    Surgery; 2022 Aug; 172(2):512-521. PubMed ID: 35393126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery.
    Brunner M; Zu'bi A; Weber K; Denz A; Langheinrich M; Kersting S; Weber GF; Grützmann R; Krautz C
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2022 Jul; 37(7):1601-1609. PubMed ID: 35704092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.