These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37464457)

  • 1. Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: A methodological study.
    Paiva Barbosa V; Bastos Silveira B; Amorim Dos Santos J; Monteiro MM; Coletta RD; De Luca Canto G; Stefani CM; Guerra ENS
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 Nov; 14(6):776-793. PubMed ID: 37464457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evolution of appraisal tool usage preferences in PROSPERO records: a study of non-Cochrane systematic reviews.
    Ruano J; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Gómez-García F; Parra-Peralbo E; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):294. PubMed ID: 38097923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of the sources, evaluation, and grading of the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews in public health: A methodological study.
    Xun Y; Guo Q; Ren M; Liu Y; Sun Y; Wu S; Lan H; Zhang J; Liu H; Wang J; Shi Q; Wang Q; Wang P; Chen Y; Shao R; Xu DR
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():998588. PubMed ID: 37064677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An observational study found large methodological heterogeneity in systematic reviews addressing prevalence and cumulative incidence.
    Hoffmann F; Eggers D; Pieper D; Zeeb H; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():92-99. PubMed ID: 31809847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.
    Zhong CCW; Zhao J; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Mao C; Yeung JWF; Chung VCH
    Alzheimers Res Ther; 2022 Oct; 14(1):159. PubMed ID: 36309725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
    Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
    Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toolkit of methodological resources to conduct systematic reviews.
    Roqué M; Martínez-García L; Solà I; Alonso-Coello P; Bonfill X; Zamora J
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():82. PubMed ID: 33082931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies.
    Harrison R; Jones B; Gardner P; Lawton R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33588842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey.
    Cheung AKL; Wong CHL; Ho L; Wu IXY; Ke FYT; Chung VCH
    BMC Complement Med Ther; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35197038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality appraisal of spatial epidemiology and health geography research: A scoping review of systematic reviews.
    Wood SM; Alston L; Beks H; Mc Namara K; Coffee NT; Clark RA; Wong Shee A; Versace VL
    Health Place; 2023 Sep; 83():103108. PubMed ID: 37651961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies-A review of recommended and commonly used tools.
    Quigley JM; Thompson JC; Halfpenny NJ; Scott DA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Feb; 25(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 29484779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness and safety of manual therapy for knee osteoarthritis: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Feng T; Wang X; Jin Z; Qin X; Sun C; Qi B; Zhang Y; Zhu L; Wei X
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1081238. PubMed ID: 36908468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
    Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
    Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Critical Analysis of Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in the Peyronie's Disease Literature.
    Bole R; Gottlich HC; Ziegelmann MJ; Corrigan D; Levine LA; Mulhall JP; Bajic P
    J Sex Med; 2022 Apr; 19(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 35177375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.