BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37464793)

  • 1. Comparing the role of 99m Tc-HYNIC-PSMA-11 and 99m Tc-MDP scintigraphy for the initial staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.
    Ghaedian T; Abdinejad M; Nasrollahi H; Ghaedian M; Firuzyar T
    Nucl Med Commun; 2023 Oct; 44(10):864-869. PubMed ID: 37464793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A prospective intra-individual comparison of [
    Lawal IO; Mokoala KMG; Mahapane J; Kleyhans J; Meckel M; Vorster M; Ebenhan T; Rösch F; Sathekge MM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2021 Jan; 48(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 32424485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic sensitivity of Tc-99m HYNIC PSMA SPECT/CT in prostate carcinoma: A comparative analysis with Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
    Lawal IO; Ankrah AO; Mokgoro NP; Vorster M; Maes A; Sathekge MM
    Prostate; 2017 Aug; 77(11):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 28649735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head-To-Head Comparison of
    Zhao G; Ji B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The diagnostic accuracy of
    Daniels H; Gilbert R; Bonin L
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Sep; 54(3):545-555. PubMed ID: 37211439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
    Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Head-to-head comparison of
    Zhang Y; Lin Z; Li T; Wei Y; Yu M; Ye L; Cai Y; Yang S; Zhang Y; Shi Y; Chen W
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15993. PubMed ID: 36163353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9.
    Lengana T; Lawal IO; Boshomane TG; Popoola GO; Mokoala KMG; Moshokoa E; Maes A; Mokgoro NP; Van de Wiele C; Vorster M; Sathekge MM
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Oct; 16(5):392-401. PubMed ID: 30120038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How accurate is
    Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Prospective Comparison of
    Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [
    Li B; Ding X; Duan L; Shi J; Tang M; Zhang J; Zhao Z; Wu X; Gao Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2024; 15():1326858. PubMed ID: 38449842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incremental Impact of [
    Szigeti F; Schweighofer-Zwink G; Meissnitzer M; Hauser-Kronberger C; Hitzl W; Kunit T; Forstner R; Pirich C; Beheshti M
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2022 Feb; 24(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34519966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
    Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraindividual Comparison of
    Rathke H; Afshar-Oromieh A; Giesel FL; Kremer C; Flechsig P; Haufe S; Mier W; Holland-Letz T; De Bucourt M; Armor T; Babich JW; Haberkorn U; Kratochwil C
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1373-1379. PubMed ID: 29371410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
    Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Ga-68 PSMA positron emission tomography/computerized tomography with Tc-99m MDP bone scan in prostate cancer patients.
    Uslu-Beşli L; Sağer S; Akgün E; Asa S; Şahin OE; Demirdağ Ç; Güner E; Khosroshahi BR; Karayel E; Pehlivanoğlu H; Aygün A; Uslu İ; Talat Z; Sönmezoğlu K
    Turk J Med Sci; 2019 Feb; 49(1):301-310. PubMed ID: 30761859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    Yılmaz B; Şahin S; Ergül N; Çolakoğlu Y; Baytekin HF; Sökmen D; Tuğcu V; Taşçı Aİ; Çermik TF
    Ann Nucl Med; 2022 Jul; 36(7):597-609. PubMed ID: 35426599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of hybrid
    Janssen JC; Meißner S; Woythal N; Prasad V; Brenner W; Diederichs G; Hamm B; Makowski MR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):610-619. PubMed ID: 28779400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [
    Hirmas N; Al-Ibraheem A; Herrmann K; Alsharif A; Muhsin H; Khader J; Al-Daghmin A; Salah S
    Mol Imaging Biol; 2019 Jun; 21(3):574-581. PubMed ID: 30215174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.