These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37465061)

  • 21. Analysis of a Near Peer Tutoring Program to Improve Medical Students' Note Writing Skills.
    Olvet DM; Wackett A; Crichlow S; Baldelli P
    Teach Learn Med; 2022; 34(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 32088996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictors of middle school students' perceptions of automated writing evaluation.
    Wilson J; Zhang F; Palermo C; Cordero TC; Myers MC; Eacker H; Potter A; Coles J
    Comput Educ; 2024 Apr; 211():104985. PubMed ID: 38562432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Effects of Teacher Feedback and Automated Feedback on Cognitive and Psychological Aspects of Foreign Language Writing: A Mixed-Methods Research.
    Wang Z; Han F
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():909802. PubMed ID: 35967647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Begin the BEGAN (The Brown Educational Guide to the Analysis of Narrative) - a framework for enhancing educational impact of faculty feedback to students' reflective writing.
    Reis SP; Wald HS; Monroe AD; Borkan JM
    Patient Educ Couns; 2010 Aug; 80(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 20056370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of genre-based instruction on Saudi university students' English writing performance and motivation: a mixed-method study.
    Abdel Latif MMM; Alghizzi TM; Alshahrani TM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1387009. PubMed ID: 38855299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating the impact of feedback on elementary aged students' fluency growth in written expression: a randomized controlled trial.
    Truckenmiller AJ; Eckert TL; Codding RS; Petscher Y
    J Sch Psychol; 2014 Dec; 52(6):531-48. PubMed ID: 25432270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating elementary-aged students' abilities to generalize and maintain fluency gains of a performance feedback writing intervention.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    Sch Psychol Q; 2014 Dec; 29(4):488-502. PubMed ID: 24708279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A qualitative insight into time-poor/grade-hungry health studies students' perceptions of using assessment criteria and feedback in assignment writing.
    Lusher J; Clements H; Stevens E
    Nurse Educ Today; 2021 Sep; 104():104999. PubMed ID: 34139584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Which characteristics of written feedback are perceived as stimulating students' reflective competence: an exploratory study.
    Dekker H; Schönrock-Adema J; Snoek JW; van der Molen T; Cohen-Schotanus J
    BMC Med Educ; 2013 Jul; 13():94. PubMed ID: 23829790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Students' satisfaction with general practitioners' feedback to their reflective writing: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kiss A; Steiner C; Grossman P; Langewitz W; Tschudi P; Kiessling C
    Can Med Educ J; 2017 Dec; 8(4):e54-e59. PubMed ID: 29354197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Writing Instruction Improves Students' Writing Skills Differentially Depending on Focal Instruction and Children: A Meta-Analysis for Primary Grade Students.
    Kim YG; Yang D; Reyes M; Connor C
    Educ Res Rev; 2021 Nov; 34():. PubMed ID: 35991709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. EFL Learner Engagement in Automatic Written Evaluation.
    Fu H; Liu X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():871707. PubMed ID: 35677133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mind the gap! Automated concept map feedback supports students in writing cohesive explanations.
    Lachner A; Burkhart C; Nückles M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Mar; 23(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 28045279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.
    Buckley S; Coleman J; Davison I; Khan KS; Zamora J; Malick S; Morley D; Pollard D; Ashcroft T; Popovic C; Sayers J
    Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 19404891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Programming generality into a performance feedback writing intervention: A randomized controlled trial.
    Hier BO; Eckert TL
    J Sch Psychol; 2016 Jun; 56():111-31. PubMed ID: 27268572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measuring critical thinking in pre-registration midwifery students: A multi-method approach.
    Carter AG; Creedy DK; Sidebotham M
    Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Feb; 61():169-174. PubMed ID: 29216601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Applying Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model to develop an online English writing course for nursing students.
    Tai HC; Pan MY; Lee BO
    Nurse Educ Today; 2015 Jun; 35(6):782-8. PubMed ID: 25753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'The Loss of My Elderly Patient:' Interactive reflective writing to support medical students' rites of passage.
    Wald HS; Reis SP; Monroe AD; Borkan JM
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(4):e178-84. PubMed ID: 20353317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of structured small-group student talk as collaborative prewriting discussions on Chinese university EFL students' individual writing: A quasi-experimental study.
    Li HH; Zhang LJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251569. PubMed ID: 34048435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of providing peer feedback on learners' genre awareness in English as a foreign language business letter writing.
    Wu H; Zhu H; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():1059555. PubMed ID: 36533036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.