These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37466907)

  • 21. Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel R; Böhm M; Battmer RD; Beckschebe J; Lenarz T
    Ear Hear; 2005 Aug; 26(4):381-8. PubMed ID: 16079633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Loudness as a cue for acceptable noise levels.
    Recker KL; McKinney MF; Edwards BW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):605-23. PubMed ID: 25313550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative contributions of specific frequency bands to the loudness of broadband sounds.
    Jesteadt W; Walker SM; Ogun OA; Ohlrich B; Brunette KE; Wróblewski M; Schmid KK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Sep; 142(3):1597. PubMed ID: 28964048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using ILD or ITD Cues for Sound Source Localization and Speech Understanding in a Complex Listening Environment by Listeners With Bilateral and With Hearing-Preservation Cochlear Implants.
    Loiselle LH; Dorman MF; Yost WA; Cook SJ; Gifford RH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 27411035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sound-source localization as a multisystem process: The Wallach azimuth illusion.
    Yost WA; Pastore MT; Pulling KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):382. PubMed ID: 31370595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual segregation of competing speech sounds: the role of spatial location.
    Drennan WR; Gatehouse S; Lever C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2178-89. PubMed ID: 14587615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patterns of Aided Loudness Growth in Experienced Adult Listeners with Early-Onset Severe-Profound Hearing Loss.
    Gottermeier L; De Filippo C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):457-476. PubMed ID: 29863461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation.
    Reinhart PN; Souza PE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of production and presentation level on the auditory distance perception of speech.
    Brungart DS; Scott KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):425-40. PubMed ID: 11508968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Loudness of complex sounds as a function of the standard stimulus and the number of components.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Bonding P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Oct; 64(4):1036-40. PubMed ID: 744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Divided listening in the free field becomes asymmetric when acoustic cues are limited.
    Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 416():108444. PubMed ID: 35078133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sound localization in noise by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Kerber S; Seeber BU
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):445-57. PubMed ID: 22588270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception difference for approaching and receding sound sources of a listener in motion in architectural sequential spaces.
    Yang T; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):685. PubMed ID: 35232108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perception of the relative distances of nearby sound sources.
    Ashmead DH; LeRoy D; Odom RD
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Apr; 47(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 2345684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech Understanding and Sound Source Localization by Cochlear Implant Listeners Using a Pinna-Effect Imitating Microphone and an Adaptive Beamformer.
    Dorman MF; Natale S; Loiselle L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Mar; 29(3):197-205. PubMed ID: 29488870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Listeners' expectations about echoes can raise or lower echo threshold.
    Clifton RK; Freyman RL; Litovsky RY; McCall D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Mar; 95(3):1525-33. PubMed ID: 8176056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Localization of tones in a room by moving listeners.
    Macaulay EJ; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Jun; 149(6):4159. PubMed ID: 34241422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.