These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37466968)

  • 1. How the SCOTUS Affirmative Action Ruling Could Affect Medical Schools and Health Care.
    Rubin R
    JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(6):492-494. PubMed ID: 37466968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preserving diversity in healthcare after the US Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling.
    Yang YT; Sudarshan S
    BMJ; 2023 Jul; 382():1691. PubMed ID: 37479230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The consequences of premature abandonment of affirmative action in medical school admissions.
    Cohen JJ
    JAMA; 2003 Mar; 289(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 12622585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SUBSIDY THREAT The Supreme Court's next big ACA ruling.
    Stempniak M
    Hosp Health Netw; 2015 Feb; 89(2):21. PubMed ID: 30277341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Panel discussion delves into details of Supreme Court's ACA ruling.
    Minn Med; 2012 Aug; 95(8):28-31. PubMed ID: 22953472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US Supreme Court poised to ban affirmative action in university admissions.
    Santoro H
    Nature; 2022 Nov; 611(7935):215. PubMed ID: 36307586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Affirmative action in the balance.
    Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Drazen JM
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jan; 368(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 23281979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Raising the bar on achieving racial diversity in higher education: the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fisher v University of Texas.
    Rosenbaum S; Teitelbaum J; Scott J
    Acad Med; 2013 Dec; 88(12):1792-4. PubMed ID: 24128633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gonzales v Raich: the US supreme court's consideration captured the public policy debate about the medical use of marijuana.
    Lorber L
    Gend Med; 2005 Sep; 2(3):124-30. PubMed ID: 16290884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the failure of health-care exceptionalism in the Supreme Court's Obamacare decision.
    Moncrieff AR
    Chest; 2012 Sep; 142(3):559-562. PubMed ID: 22847071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions.
    Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medication Abortion Through Telemedicine: Implications of a Ruling by the Iowa Supreme Court.
    Yang YT; Kozhimannil KB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):313-6. PubMed ID: 26942359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The US Supreme Court's ruling on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
    Steinbrook R
    BMJ; 2012 Jun; 344():e4503. PubMed ID: 22753886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action.
    Wiist WH
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 101(7):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21421946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Less than expected. With projections that the Supreme Court's ACA ruling means fewer will be insured, providers are scrambling to find out how they'll fare and sending PAC cash to those who can help.
    Zigmond J; Daly R
    Mod Healthc; 2012 Jul; 42(31):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 22953340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment.
    Gostin LO; Wetter S
    JAMA; 2023 May; 329(18):1549-1550. PubMed ID: 37000439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Avera Marshall decision. What the Supreme Court's ruling means for hospitals and physicians.
    Struthers M; Knoedler T
    Minn Med; 2015 May; 98(5):29-31. PubMed ID: 26065185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discovery rule in medical malpractice under the Federal Tort Claims Act: the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Kubrick was not meant to be secondary authority.
    Zajdel C
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2004; 20(2):443-66. PubMed ID: 15239365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. It's about time. Court's ruling caps a century of reform struggle and policy twists.
    McLaughlin N
    Mod Healthc; 2012 Jul; 42(27):9. PubMed ID: 22849044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.