These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37466968)

  • 41. The Constitution and the Public's Health: The Consequences of the US Supreme Court's Medicaid Decision in
    Sunkara V; Rosenbaum S
    Public Health Rep; 2016 Nov; 131(6):844-846. PubMed ID: 28123233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Ulrich MR
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Oct; 387(14):1245-1247. PubMed ID: 36193944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Two steps forward, one step back? Implications of the Supreme Court's health reform ruling for individuals with mental illness.
    Golberstein E; Busch SH
    JAMA Psychiatry; 2013 Jun; 70(6):567-8. PubMed ID: 23553230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Biomarkers unbound--the Supreme Court's ruling on diagnostic-test patents.
    Kesselheim AS; Karlawish J
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(25):2338-40. PubMed ID: 22621421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An oncology perspective on the Supreme Court's pending decision regarding the Affordable Care Act.
    Stranne SK; Halgren MG
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2012 May; 26(5):426-7, 430. PubMed ID: 22730600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. ARNP supervision of fluoroscopy--considerations in light of the Iowa Supreme Court's ruling.
    Freeman J
    Iowa Med; 2013; 103(3):22. PubMed ID: 25211969
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How Much Information is Enough? Understanding the Alabama Supreme Court's Expansion of the Causation Standard in Failure to Warn Claims.
    Herr A
    Am J Law Med; 2023 Mar; 49(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 37376912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Anti-choice group seeks Supreme Court review of federal clinic access law; Congress holds hearings.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1995 May; 4(10):2. PubMed ID: 12346170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An issue that won't die: Court's ruling on doctor-assisted suicide leaves some basic questions unresolved.
    Scott J
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Jun; ():A1, A19. PubMed ID: 11647210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Implications of United States Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization: perspective of physicians caring for critically ill fetuses and newborns.
    Arya B; Donofrio MT; Freud LR; Hornberger LK; Moon-Grady AJ; Morris SA; Pinto N; Simpson LL; Cuneo BF; Divanovic A; Jaeggi E; Peyvandi S; Puchalski MD; Rychik J; Schidlow DN; Srivastava S; Tacy TA; Tworetzky W; Walsh MJ
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):812-813. PubMed ID: 36353858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. US Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action impacts oncology.
    Das M
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):843. PubMed ID: 37423226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Supreme Court's historic ruling on the Affordable Care Act: economic sustainability and universal coverage.
    Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2012 Aug; 308(6):571-2. PubMed ID: 22772470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Inside the US Supreme Court's war on science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2022 Sep; 609(7927):460-462. PubMed ID: 36104405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A matter of life or death. By upholding an assisted-suicide law, the Supreme Court helps reinforce the rights of doctors, patients and the statest.
    Taylor M
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Jan; 36(4):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 16480096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Affirmative action after the Supreme Court's 1988-1989 term: what employers need to know.
    Thacker RA
    Employ Relat Today; 1990; 17(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 10105600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. SCOTUS and the voters have spoken: where do we go from here?
    Showalter JS
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2013 Jan; 67(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 23360056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. After Cruzan. The U. S. Supreme Court's decision settles the case but raises new questions.
    Johnson SH
    Health Prog; 1990 Oct; 71(8):38-41, 57. PubMed ID: 10107437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates.
    Crosby FJ; Iyer A; Clayton S; Downing RA
    Am Psychol; 2003 Feb; 58(2):93-115. PubMed ID: 12747013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. In the wake of the verdict: the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the federal health law leaves lawmakers working out what it means for their states.
    King M
    State Legis; 2012; 38(7):46-7. PubMed ID: 22893930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.