These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37467025)

  • 21. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
    Rassweiler J; Frede T
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single-port Robotic Pelvic Bulky Lymph Node Resection: A Case Report.
    Gungor M; Takmaz O; Afsar S; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1030-1031. PubMed ID: 27311875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An ergonomic comfort workspace analysis of master manipulator for robotic laparoscopic surgery with motion scaled teleoperation system.
    Kang D; Kwon DS
    Int J Med Robot; 2022 Dec; 18(6):e2448. PubMed ID: 35986717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Preliminary report of multi degrees of freedom forceps for endoscopic surgery.
    Usui S; Inoue H; Yoshida T; Kudo SE; Iwai T
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2004 Apr; 14(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 15287603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robotics and telesurgery--an update on their position in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Rassweiler J; Safi KC; Subotic S; Teber D; Frede T
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2005; 14(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 16754625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic surgical device with modular end tools for real-time endomicroscopy and therapy.
    Wang H; Zuo S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Apr; 59(4):787-797. PubMed ID: 33677776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.
    Nezhat C; Saberi NS; Shahmohamady B; Nezhat F
    JSLS; 2006; 10(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 17212887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic applications in abdominal surgery: their limitations and future developments.
    Taylor GW; Jayne DG
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():3-9. PubMed ID: 17441019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The efficacy of robotic driven handheld instruments for the acquisition of basic laparoscopic suturing skills.
    Zapardiel I; Hernandez A; De Santiago J
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():106-9. PubMed ID: 25668135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pneumatic-type surgical robot end-effector for laparoscopic surgical-operation-by-wire.
    Lee C; Park WJ; Kim M; Noh S; Yoon C; Lee C; Kim Y; Kim HH; Kim HC; Kim S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():130. PubMed ID: 25189221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surger.
    Kuebler B; Seibold U; Hirzinger G
    Int J Med Robot; 2005 Sep; 1(3):96-107. PubMed ID: 17518396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques.
    Park S; Kim NK
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Jul; 30(7):837-46. PubMed ID: 26130943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
    Cleary RK; Mullard AJ; Ferraro J; Regenbogen SE
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1515-1524. PubMed ID: 28916895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Articulated minimally invasive surgical instrument based on compliant mechanism.
    Arata J; Kogiso S; Sakaguchi M; Nakadate R; Oguri S; Uemura M; Byunghyun C; Akahoshi T; Ikeda T; Hashizume M
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1837-43. PubMed ID: 25698401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current status and future directions of robotic single-site surgery: a systematic review.
    Autorino R; Kaouk JH; Stolzenburg JU; Gill IS; Mottrie A; Tewari A; Cadeddu JA
    Eur Urol; 2013 Feb; 63(2):266-80. PubMed ID: 22940173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modeling and evaluation of hand-eye coordination of surgical robotic system on task performance.
    Gao Y; Wang S; Li J; Li A; Liu H; Xing Y
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Dec; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 28471060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Concept design of robotic modules for needlescopic surgery.
    Sen S; Harada K; Hewitt Z; Susilo E; Kobayashi E; Sakuma I
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2017 Aug; 26(4):232-239. PubMed ID: 28635406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study.
    El Hachem L; Andikyan V; Mathews S; Friedman K; Poeran J; Shieh K; Geoghegan M; Gretz HF
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26992935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Robotic suturing: technique and benefit in advanced laparoscopic surgery.
    Kenngott HG; Muller-Stich BP; Reiter MA; Rassweiler J; Gutt CN
    Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2008; 17(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 18609002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.