These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37467477)

  • 1. Computational Reproducibility of Molecular Phylogenies.
    Kumar S; Tao Q; Lamarca AP; Tamura K
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 Jul; 40(7):. PubMed ID: 37467477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of irreproducibility in maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference.
    Shen XX; Li Y; Hittinger CT; Chen XX; Rokas A
    Nat Commun; 2020 Nov; 11(1):6096. PubMed ID: 33257660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online Phylogenetics with matOptimize Produces Equivalent Trees and is Dramatically More Efficient for Large SARS-CoV-2 Phylogenies than de novo and Maximum-Likelihood Implementations.
    Kramer AM; Thornlow B; Ye C; De Maio N; McBroome J; Hinrichs AS; Lanfear R; Turakhia Y; Corbett-Detig R
    Syst Biol; 2023 Nov; 72(5):1039-1051. PubMed ID: 37232476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quartet Sampling distinguishes lack of support from conflicting support in the green plant tree of life.
    Pease JB; Brown JW; Walker JF; Hinchliff CE; Smith SA
    Am J Bot; 2018 Mar; 105(3):385-403. PubMed ID: 29746719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method.
    Tamura K; Nei M; Kumar S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jul; 101(30):11030-5. PubMed ID: 15258291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Data-specific substitution models improve protein-based phylogenetics.
    Brazão JM; Foster PG; Cox CJ
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15716. PubMed ID: 37576497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated reconstruction of whole-genome phylogenies from short-sequence reads.
    Bertels F; Silander OK; Pachkov M; Rainey PB; van Nimwegen E
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 May; 31(5):1077-88. PubMed ID: 24600054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenies, the Comparative Method, and the Conflation of Tempo and Mode.
    Kaliontzopoulou A; Adams DC
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jan; 65(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 26470878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When can decreasing diversification rates be detected with molecular phylogenies and the fossil record?
    Liow LH; Quental TB; Marshall CR
    Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 20861283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of topological inaccuracy in evolutionary trees on the phylogenetic comparative method of independent contrasts.
    Symonds MR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Aug; 51(4):541-53. PubMed ID: 12227998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficiency of the neighbor-joining method in reconstructing deep and shallow evolutionary relationships in large phylogenies.
    Kumar S; Gadagkar SR
    J Mol Evol; 2000 Dec; 51(6):544-53. PubMed ID: 11116328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments.
    Whelan S
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):727-40. PubMed ID: 17849327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the performance of a successive-approximations approach to parameter optimization in maximum-likelihood phylogeny estimation.
    Sullivan J; Abdo Z; Joyce P; Swofford DL
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Jun; 22(6):1386-92. PubMed ID: 15758203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferring demographic parameters in bacterial genomic data using Bayesian and hybrid phylogenetic methods.
    Duchene S; Duchene DA; Geoghegan JL; Dyson ZA; Hawkey J; Holt KE
    BMC Evol Biol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):95. PubMed ID: 29914372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-molecular systematics and the future of phylogenetics.
    Pyron RA
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2015 Jul; 30(7):384-9. PubMed ID: 26014093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting microbial traits with phylogenies.
    Goberna M; Verdú M
    ISME J; 2016 Apr; 10(4):959-67. PubMed ID: 26371406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Short Tree, Long Tree, Right Tree, Wrong Tree: New Acquisition Bias Corrections for Inferring SNP Phylogenies.
    Leaché AD; Banbury BL; Felsenstein J; de Oca AN; Stamatakis A
    Syst Biol; 2015 Nov; 64(6):1032-47. PubMed ID: 26227865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building Phylogenies from Transcriptomic Data.
    Benítez-Álvarez L; Leria L; Dols-Serrate D; Riutort M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2680():1-27. PubMed ID: 37428368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.