187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37467975)
1. Recoupling livestock and feed production in the Netherlands to reduce environmental impacts.
van Selm B; Hijbeek R; van Ittersum MK; van Hal O; van Middelaar CE; de Boer IJM
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov; 899():165540. PubMed ID: 37467975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interventions to increase circularity and reduce environmental impacts in food systems.
van Selm B; van Zanten HHE; Hijbeek R; van Middelaar CE; Schop M; van Ittersum MK; de Boer IJM
Ambio; 2024 Mar; 53(3):359-375. PubMed ID: 37973704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.
Cederberg C; Hedenus F; Wirsenius S; Sonesson U
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 23031741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining beef cattle and sheep in an organic system. II. Benefits for economic and environmental performance.
Benoit M; Vazeille K; Jury C; Troquier C; Veysset P; Prache S
Animal; 2023 Apr; 17(4):100759. PubMed ID: 36966689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementing an appropriate metric for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from livestock production: A national case study.
Hörtenhuber SJ; Seiringer M; Theurl MC; Größbacher V; Piringer G; Kral I; Zollitsch WJ
Animal; 2022 Oct; 16(10):100638. PubMed ID: 36182718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Greenhouse gas emissions and carbon footprint of maize-based feed products for animal farming in Thailand.
Moungsree S; Neamhom T; Polprasert S; Suwannahong K; Polprasert C; Patthanaissaranukool W
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(2):2657-2670. PubMed ID: 38066284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cattle production strategies to deliver protein with less land and lower environmental impact.
Henn D; Duffy C; Humphreys J; Gibbons J; Byrne KA; Styles D
J Environ Manage; 2024 Apr; 356():120569. PubMed ID: 38484594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of changing toward higher welfare broiler production systems on greenhouse gas emissions: a Dutch case study using life cycle assessment.
Mostert PF; Bos AP; van Harn J; de Jong IC
Poult Sci; 2022 Dec; 101(12):102151. PubMed ID: 36279609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mitigation of gaseous emissions from dairy livestock: A farm-level method to examine the financial implications.
Cantillon M; Hennessy T; Amon B; Dragoni F; O'Brien D
J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 352():119904. PubMed ID: 38194877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Healthy diets with reduced environmental impact? - The greenhouse gas emissions of various diets adhering to the Dutch food based dietary guidelines.
van de Kamp ME; van Dooren C; Hollander A; Geurts M; Brink EJ; van Rossum C; Biesbroek S; de Valk E; Toxopeus IB; Temme EHM
Food Res Int; 2018 Feb; 104():14-24. PubMed ID: 29433779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Localising livestock protein feed production and the impact on land use and greenhouse gas emissions.
Sasu-Boakye Y; Cederberg C; Wirsenius S
Animal; 2014 Aug; 8(8):1339-48. PubMed ID: 26263191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from stored manure from beef cattle supplemented 3-nitrooxypropanol and monensin to reduce enteric methane emissions.
Owens JL; Thomas BW; Stoeckli JL; Beauchemin KA; McAllister TA; Larney FJ; Hao X
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19310. PubMed ID: 33168849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Global environmental costs of China's thirst for milk.
Bai Z; Lee MRF; Ma L; Ledgard S; Oenema O; Velthof GL; Ma W; Guo M; Zhao Z; Wei S; Li S; Liu X; Havlík P; Luo J; Hu C; Zhang F
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 May; 24(5):2198-2211. PubMed ID: 29417720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human-edible protein contribution of tropical beef cattle production systems at different levels of intensification.
Fernandes MHMR; Cardoso AS; Lima LO; Berça AS; Reis RA
Animal; 2022 Aug; 16 Suppl 3():100538. PubMed ID: 35644846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emissions savings in the corn-ethanol life cycle from feeding coproducts to livestock.
Bremer VR; Liska AJ; Klopfenstein TJ; Erickson GE; Yang HS; Walters DT; Cassman KG
J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):472-82. PubMed ID: 20176820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mitigating climate change: the role of domestic livestock.
Gill M; Smith P; Wilkinson JM
Animal; 2010 Mar; 4(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 22443938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption.
Oonincx DG; van Itterbeeck J; Heetkamp MJ; van den Brand H; van Loon JJ; van Huis A
PLoS One; 2010 Dec; 5(12):e14445. PubMed ID: 21206900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States.
Eshel G; Shepon A; Makov T; Milo R
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Aug; 111(33):11996-2001. PubMed ID: 25049416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated assessment of agricultural practices on large scale losses of ammonia, greenhouse gases, nutrients and heavy metals to air and water.
de Vries W; Kros J; Voogd JC; Ros GH
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159220. PubMed ID: 36209876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
