These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37468668)

  • 21. Effects of Age and Location in Chinese Relative Clauses Processing.
    He W; Xu N; Ji R
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1067-1086. PubMed ID: 28236141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The on-line resolution of the sentence complement/relative clause ambiguity: evidence from Spanish.
    Demestre J; García-Albea JE
    Exp Psychol; 2004; 51(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 14959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Japanese learners' processing time for reading English relative clauses analyzed in relation to their English listening proficiency].
    Oyama Y
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2011 Jun; 82(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 21735725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.
    Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Jul; 16(4):555-68. PubMed ID: 2142952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effects of restrictiveness on relative clause processing in Farsi.
    Seifi P; Loerts H; Mak P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 Jul; 247():104299. PubMed ID: 38761751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Is sentence ambiguity comprehension affected after mild traumatic brain injury? Results suggest cognitive control is more important than diagnosis.
    Key-DeLyria SE; Rogalski Y; Bodner T; Weichselbaum A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Sep; 57(5):990-1005. PubMed ID: 35611868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: evidence from semantic priming.
    Nicol JL; Pickering MJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1993 Mar; 22(2):207-37. PubMed ID: 8366476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: a computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar.
    Vosse T; Kempen G
    Cognition; 2000 May; 75(2):105-43. PubMed ID: 10771275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sentence comprehension in Slovak-speaking patients with Alzheimer's disease.
    Marková J; Horváthová Ľ; Králová M; Cséfalvay Z
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2017 Jul; 52(4):456-468. PubMed ID: 28000389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Capturing individual differences in sentence processing: How reliable is the self-paced reading task?
    Frinsel FF; Christiansen MH
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38379113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developmental changes in misinterpretation of garden-path wh-questions in French.
    Lassotta R; Omaki A; Franck J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):829-54. PubMed ID: 26052979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is children's reading "good enough"? Links between online processing and comprehension as children read syntactically ambiguous sentences.
    Wonnacott E; Joseph HS; Adelman JS; Nation K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):855-79. PubMed ID: 25774745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the reading of mild garden path sentences.
    Meseguer E; Carreiras M; Clifton C
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 12184556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Unforced Revision in Processing Relative Clause Association Ambiguity in Japanese: Evidence Against Revision as Last Resort.
    Yamada T; Arai M; Hirose Y
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Jun; 46(3):661-714. PubMed ID: 27866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Canonical word order and interference-based integration costs during sentence comprehension: the case of Spanish subject- and object-relative clauses.
    del Río D; López-Higes R; Martín-Aragoneses MT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2108-28. PubMed ID: 22524672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noisy is better than rare: Comprehenders compromise subject-verb agreement to form more probable linguistic structures.
    Keshev M; Meltzer-Asscher A
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101359. PubMed ID: 33254044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of only on syntactic processing of "long" relative clause sentences.
    Liversedge SP; Paterson KB; Clayes EL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Jan; 55(1):225-40. PubMed ID: 11873848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Conceptual plural information is used to guide early parsing decisions: Evidence from garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs.
    Patson ND; Ferreira F
    J Mem Lang; 2009 May; 60(4):464-486. PubMed ID: 20161247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Processing Double-Embedded Relative Clauses: Working-Memory Constraints or Language Statistics?
    Frank SL; Trompenaars T; Vasishth S
    Cogn Sci; 2016 Apr; 40(3):554-78. PubMed ID: 25943302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Preference for Object Relative Clauses in Chinese Sentence Comprehension: Evidence From Online Self-Paced Reading Time.
    Xu K; Duann JR; Hung DL; Wu DH
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2210. PubMed ID: 31632322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.