These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Relationship of maxilla to cranial base in different facial types-a cephalometric evaluation. Rana T; Khanna R; Tikku T; Sachan K J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2012; 2(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 25756029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of the vertical facial pattern on the developmental relationship between the nasal bone and maxillary central incisors. Shi J; Al-Ak'hali MS; Cai D; Guo Q; Cao Y; Alhammadi MS; Mashrah MA; Yang Y BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):211. PubMed ID: 37046239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Correlation of Vertical Dentoalveolar Heights with Palatal Plane Inclination in Adults with Different Vertical Facial Patterns]. Farhat Z; Osman E; Kassem H; Bouserhal J Orthod Fr; 2022 Dec; 93(4):321-331. PubMed ID: 36718754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern. Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M Dental Press J Orthod; 2016; 21(4):41-9. PubMed ID: 27653263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study. Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationships between facial divergence and DMD parameters. Halimi A; Benyahia H; Azeroual MF; Bahije L; Zaoui F Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):698-707. PubMed ID: 29122570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study. Perović TM; Blažej M; Jovanović I Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2022; 81(2):472-480. PubMed ID: 33778942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns. Rohila AK; Sharma VP; Shrivastav PK; Nagar A; Singh GP Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(6):726-31. PubMed ID: 23649053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Study of the canalis mandibulae morphology in different vertical facial types]. Mártha I K; Bica C; Kész B; Kerekes Máthé B Orv Hetil; 2017 Nov; 158(46):1841-1847. PubMed ID: 29135290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Dento-facial structural characteristics in Angle Class II malocclusion associated with abnormal facial divergency]. Wu KM; Chen YJ; Cheng MC; Chang HF; Chen KC J Formos Med Assoc; 1992 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S130-8. PubMed ID: 1358360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alveolar and Skeletal Chin Dimensions Associated with Lower Facial Height Among Different Divergent Patterns. Khan MY; Kishore MS; Bukhari SA; Rachala MR; Sashidhar NR J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC75-80. PubMed ID: 27437365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of mandibular characteristics in patients affected with β-thalassaemia major: A retrospective case-control study. Movahhedian N; Akbarizadeh F; Khojastepour L; Sardarian AR; Pakshir HR; Ahrari F Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):776-783. PubMed ID: 32768291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Vertical Facial Growth Pattern on Herbst Appliance Effects in Prepubertal Patients: A Retrospective Controlled Study. Giuca MR; Pasini M; Drago S; Del Corso L; Vanni A; Carli E; Manni A Int J Dent; 2020; 2020():1018793. PubMed ID: 32399031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of anterior mandibular alveolar thickness and height in young adults with different sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships: A CBCT Study. Casanova-Sarmiento JA; Arriola-Guillén LE; Ruíz-Mora GA; Rodríguez-Cárdenas YA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 31735681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating diagnostic performance of three cephalometric vertical parameters. Azeez SM Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 37417057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of mandibular morphology in different facial types. Mangla R; Singh N; Dua V; Padmanabhan P; Khanna M Contemp Clin Dent; 2011 Jul; 2(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 22090764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of the anterior and posterior length and deflection angle of the cranial base, in individuals with facial Pattern I, II and III. Thiesen G; Pletsch G; Zastrow MD; do Valle CV; do Valle-Corotti KM; Patel MP; Conti PC Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 23876952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]