BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37469720)

  • 1. Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Morarasu BC; Sorodoc V; Haisan A; Morarasu S; Bologa C; Haliga RE; Lionte C; Marciuc EA; Elsiddig M; Cimpoesu D; Dimofte GM; Sorodoc L
    World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(19):4513-4530. PubMed ID: 37469720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV; Thulaseedharan NK; Raj R; Unnikrishnan DC; Jacob A
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L; Xu F; Yuan J
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk assessment in acute non-variceal upper GI bleeding: the AIMS65 score in comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in a Scottish population.
    Palmer AJ; Moroni F; Mcleish S; Campbell G; Bardgett J; Round J; McMullan C; Rashid M; Clark R; De Las Heras D; Vincent C
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 7(2):90-96. PubMed ID: 28839841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
    Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Boustany A; Alali AA; Almadi M; Martel M; Barkun AN
    J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 37629235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
    Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding.
    Noh JH; Cha B; Ahn JY; Na HK; Lee JH; Jung KW; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Jung HY
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30410. PubMed ID: 36086775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Prasitvarakul K; Attanath N; Chang A
    World J Surg; 2024 Feb; 48(2):474-483. PubMed ID: 38686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of scoring systems that accurately predict the prognosis of lower gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Yeon SH; Moon HS; Choi SW; Kang SH; Sung JK; Jeong HY
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Feb; 38(1):51. PubMed ID: 36806639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk scores in prediction for the clinical outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding.
    Yang L; Sun R; Wei N; Chen H
    Ann Med; 2021 Dec; 53(1):1806-1815. PubMed ID: 34661508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic value of liver stiffness measurement combined with risk scores for esophagogastric variceal bleeding in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis.
    Lin LY; Zeng DW; Liu YR; Zhu YY; Huang LL
    Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111385. PubMed ID: 38377895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: where are we in 2018?
    Alzoubaidi D; Lovat LB; Haidry R
    Frontline Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 10(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 30651955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three Simple Parameters on Admission to the Emergency Department are Predictors for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Suspected Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Acehan F; Karsavuranoğlu B; Kalkan C; Aslan M; Altiparmak E; Ates I
    J Emerg Med; 2024 Feb; 66(2):64-73. PubMed ID: 38267298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MH-STRALP: A scoring system for prognostication in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Hu JN; Xu F; Hao YR; Sun CY; Wu KM; Lin Y; Zhong L; Zeng X
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):790-806. PubMed ID: 38577095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of 30-day in-hospital mortality in older UGIB patients using a simplified risk score and comparison with AIMS65 score.
    Xue Z; Che H; Xie D; Ren J; Si Q
    BMC Geriatr; 2024 Jun; 24(1):534. PubMed ID: 38902633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discharge of patients with an acute upper gastrointestinal bleed from the emergency department using an extended Glasgow-Blatchford Score.
    Banister T; Spiking J; Ayaru L
    BMJ Open Gastroenterol; 2018; 5(1):e000225. PubMed ID: 30233807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Features of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and factors affecting the re-bleeding risk.
    Uysal E; Acar YA
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(2):147-154. PubMed ID: 35099025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mortality Risk Scoring System in Patients after Bleeding from Cancers in the Upper Gastrointestinal Tract.
    Kim HM; Kang D; Park JY; Cho YK; Choi MG; Park JM
    Gut Liver; 2024 Mar; 18(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 37722853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.