178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37469720)
21. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
Aluizio CLS; Montes CG; Reis GFSR; Nagasako CK
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Outcomes of variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective, multicenter, population-based study from West Hungary].
Lakatos L; Gönczi L; Izbéki F; Patai Á; Rácz I; Gasztonyi B; Varga-Szabó L; Barnabás Á; Iliás Á; Lakatos PL
Orv Hetil; 2021 Aug; 162(31):1252-1259. PubMed ID: 34333456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Lai YC; Hung MS; Chen YH; Chen YC
J Acute Med; 2018 Dec; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
Robertson M; Ng J; Abu Shawish W; Swaine A; Skardoon G; Huynh A; Deshpande S; Low ZY; Sievert W; Angus P
Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. External validation and comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford score, modified Glasgow-Blatchford score, Rockall score and AIMS65 score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a cross-sectional observational study in Western Switzerland.
Rivieri S; Carron PN; Schoepfer A; Ageron FX
Eur J Emerg Med; 2023 Feb; 30(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 36542335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CLINICAL UTILITY OF RISK SCORES IN VARICEAL BLEEDING.
Chandnani S; Rathi P; Udgirkar SS; Sonthalia N; Contractor Q; Jain S
Arq Gastroenterol; 2019; 56(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 31633727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Can Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score Predict the Occurrence of Hypotension in Initially Normotensive Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?].
Kim JS; Ko BS; Son CH; Ahn S; Seo DW; Lee YS; Lee JH; Oh BJ; Lim KS; Kim WY
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 67(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26809627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of risk scores in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in western India: A prospective analysis.
Chandnani S; Rathi P; Sonthalia N; Udgirkar S; Jain S; Contractor Q; Jain S; Singh AK
Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 38(2):117-127. PubMed ID: 31124017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Both Full Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Modified Glasgow-Blatchford Score Predict the Need for Intervention and Mortality in Patients with Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Ur-Rahman A; Guan J; Khalid S; Munaf A; Sharbatji M; Idrisov E; He X; Machavarapu A; Abusaada K
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(11):3020-3025. PubMed ID: 30022452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pre-Endoscopic Scores Predicting Low-Risk Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Boustany A; Alali AA; Almadi M; Martel M; Barkun AN
J Clin Med; 2023 Aug; 12(16):. PubMed ID: 37629235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Ak R; Hökenek NM
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Prospective comparison of three risk scoring systems in non-variceal and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Thanapirom K; Ridtitid W; Rerknimitr R; Thungsuk R; Noophun P; Wongjitrat C; Luangjaru S; Vedkijkul P; Lertkupinit C; Poonsab S; Ratanachu-ek T; Hansomburana P; Pornthisarn B; Thongbai T; Mahachai V; Treeprasertsuk S
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 31(4):761-7. PubMed ID: 26514879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems.
Hirai R; Shimodate Y; Minami M; Ishikawa S; Kanadani T; Takezawa R; Doi A; Nishimura N; Mouri H; Matsueda K; Yamamoto H; Mizuno M
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Dec; 33(12):1480-1484. PubMed ID: 33252414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Scoring systems for peptic ulcer bleeding: Which one to use?
Budimir I; Stojsavljević S; Baršić N; Bišćanin A; Mirošević G; Bohnec S; Kirigin LS; Pavić T; Ljubičić N
World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 23(41):7450-7458. PubMed ID: 29151699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
