These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37470250)

  • 1. Single- vs. combined-category preference assessments for edible, leisure, and social-interaction stimuli.
    Goldberg NM; Roscoe EM; Newman ZA; Sedano AJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Oct Autumn (Fall); 56(4):787-803. PubMed ID: 37470250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of displacement and reinforcer potency for typically developing children.
    Carter AB; Zonneveld KLM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Apr; 53(2):1130-1144. PubMed ID: 31486076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stability of preference and reinforcing efficacy of edible, leisure, and social attention stimuli.
    Butler C; Graff RB
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):684-699. PubMed ID: 33469909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing the efficiency of paired-stimulus preference assessments by identifying categories of preference.
    Ciccone FJ; Graff RB; Ahearn WH
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 25754896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of Edible and Leisure Reinforcers with Domestic Dogs.
    Lazaro XA; Winter JM; Fernand JK; Cox DJ; Dorey NR
    Animals (Basel); 2023 Sep; 13(19):. PubMed ID: 37835679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A replication of preference displacement research in children with autism spectrum disorder.
    Sipila-Thomas ES; Foote AJ; White AN; Melanson IJ; Brodhead MT
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Jan; 54(1):403-416. PubMed ID: 32989755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the effects of social interaction on the results of preference assessments for leisure items.
    Kanaman NA; Hubbs AL; Dozier CL; Jones BA; Foley E; Brandt JA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2022 Mar; 55(2):430-450. PubMed ID: 34958457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli.
    Morris SL; Gallagher ML; Allen AE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Apr; 56(2):416-427. PubMed ID: 36922701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preference for leisure items over edible items in individuals with dementia: A replication.
    Lucock ZR; Sharp RA; Jones RS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1780-1788. PubMed ID: 31957021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Magnitude on the Displacement of Leisure Items by Edible Items During Preference Assessments.
    Clark SB; Call NA; Simmons CA; Scheithauer MC; Muething CS; Parks N
    Behav Modif; 2020 Sep; 44(5):727-745. PubMed ID: 30983381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
    Roane HS; Vollmer TR; Ringdahl JE; Marcus BA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1998; 31(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 9891397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism.
    Conine DE; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 May; 52(2):557-573. PubMed ID: 30468244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Role of Context in the Evaluation of Reinforcer Efficacy: Implications for the Preference Assessment Outcomes.
    Mangum A; Roane H; Fredrick L; Pabico R
    Res Autism Spectr Disord; 2012 Jan; 6(1):158-167. PubMed ID: 22125577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further examination of video-based preference assessments without contingent access.
    Brodhead MT; Kim SY; Rispoli MJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Feb; 52(1):258-270. PubMed ID: 30238441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Including unfamiliar stimuli in preference assessments for young children with autism.
    Kenzer AL; Bishop MR; Wilke AE; Tarbox JR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(3):689-94. PubMed ID: 24114234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative preferences for edible and leisure stimuli in children with autism: A replication in Italy.
    Slanzi CM; Graziano M; D'Angelo G; Vollmer TR; Conine DE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31835275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.
    Fahmie TA; Iwata BA; Jann KE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):331-43. PubMed ID: 25891170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Web-based stimulus preference assessment and reinforcer assessment for videos.
    Curiel H; Poling A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Jul; 52(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 31219192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of picture and GIF-based preference assessments for social interaction.
    Morris SL; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Jul; 53(3):1452-1465. PubMed ID: 31965577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison between traditional economical and demand curve analyses of relative reinforcer efficacy in the validation of preference assessment predictions.
    Reed DD; Luiselli JK; Magnuson JD; Fillers S; Vieira S; Rue HC
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2009 Jun; 12(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 19466625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.