BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37470613)

  • 1. Performance evaluation of Monaco radiotherapy treatment planning system using CIRS Thorax Phantom: Dosimetric assessment of flattened and non-flattened photon beams.
    Saini A; Verma T; Pandey VP; Singh A; Kumar P
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2023; 19(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 37470613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comprehensive Study of the Out of Field Non Target Dose Associated with 6 and 10 MV Flattened and Flattening Filter Free X Ray Beam in a True Beam Linear Accelerator.
    Athiyaman H; Anbu G; Mayilvaganan A; Chougule A; Sharma N; Kumar HS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1529-1538. PubMed ID: 38809624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation.
    Wang Y; Easterling SB; Ting JY
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3758. PubMed ID: 22955642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose.
    Guy CL; Karki K; Sharma M; Kim S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):140-148. PubMed ID: 27929489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of different photon beam energies in stereotactic radiosurgery with cones.
    Ding GX; Homann KL
    Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):5201-5211. PubMed ID: 37122235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of oblique tangential photon beams calculated by superposition/convolution algorithms: a Monte Carlo evaluation.
    Chow JC; Jiang R; Leung MK
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 12(1):3424. PubMed ID: 21330989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigation of photon beam models in heterogeneous media of modern radiotherapy.
    Ding W; Johnston PN; Wong TP; Bubb IF
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2004 Jun; 27(2):39-48. PubMed ID: 15462585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating impact of medium variation on dose calculated through planning system in a low cost in-house phantom.
    Saini A; Pandey VP; Singh A; Kumar P
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Feb; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 35144251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superficial and peripheral dose in compensator-based FFF beam IMRT.
    Zhang DG; Feygelman V; Moros EG; Latifi K; Hoffe S; Frakes J; Zhang GG
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):151-156. PubMed ID: 28291940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flattening filter free beams in SBRT and IMRT: dosimetric assessment of peripheral doses.
    Kragl G; Baier F; Lutz S; Albrich D; Dalaryd M; Kroupa B; Wiezorek T; Knöös T; Georg D
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 20888199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface dose investigation of the flattening filter-free photon beams.
    Wang Y; Khan MK; Ting JY; Easterling SB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):e281-5. PubMed ID: 22414287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining tissue-phantom ratios to provide a beam-quality specifier for flattening filter free photon beams.
    Dalaryd M; Knöös T; Ceberg C
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111716. PubMed ID: 25370630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of phantom scatter from flattened and flattening filter free high-energy photon beams.
    Richmond N; Allen V; Daniel J; Dacey R; Walker C
    Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 25454113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface dose variations in 6 and 10 MV flattened and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams.
    Cashmore J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 17(5):293-307. PubMed ID: 27685127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monte Carlo comparison of superficial dose between flattening filter free and flattened beams.
    Javedan K; Feygelman V; Zhang RR; Moros EG; Correa CR; Trotti A; Li W; Zhang GG
    Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):503-8. PubMed ID: 24662096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric Validation of Treatment Planning System for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.b.
    Prasath S; Ramesh Babu P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1715-1723. PubMed ID: 38809644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a fast and feasible spectrum modeling technique for flattening filter free beams.
    Cho W; Bush K; Mok E; Xing L; Suh TS
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041721. PubMed ID: 23556891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beam characteristics of energy-matched flattening filter free beams.
    Paynter D; Weston SJ; Cosgrove VP; Evans JA; Thwaites DI
    Med Phys; 2014 May; 41(5):052103. PubMed ID: 24784392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.