These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37470981)

  • 1. A signal detection-based confidence-similarity model of face matching.
    Fitousi D
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Apr; 131(3):625-663. PubMed ID: 37470981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the proportion of mismatching trials and task orientation on the confidence-accuracy relationship in unfamiliar face matching.
    Stephens RG; Semmler C; Sauer JD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Sep; 23(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 28805443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding face matching.
    Fysh MC; Bindemann M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Apr; 76(4):862-880. PubMed ID: 35587796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling face similarity in police lineups.
    Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual similarity modulates effects of learning from variability on face recognition.
    Honig T; Shoham A; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2022 Dec; 201():108128. PubMed ID: 36272208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decision processes account of the differences in the eyewitness confidence-accuracy relationship between strong and weak face recognizers under suboptimal exposure and delay conditions.
    Gettleman JN; Grabman JH; Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Mar; 47(3):402-421. PubMed ID: 33030941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical face masks impair human face matching performance for familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Carragher DJ; Hancock PJB
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):59. PubMed ID: 33210257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Elevated stress impairs the accuracy of eyewitness memory but not the confidence-accuracy relationship.
    Pezdek K; Abed E; Cormia A
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):158-169. PubMed ID: 32730053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Models of lineup memory.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():81-114. PubMed ID: 30032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic feature training improves face matching accuracy.
    Towler A; Keshwa M; Ton B; Kemp RI; White D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1288-1298. PubMed ID: 33914576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human-algorithm teaming in face recognition: How algorithm outcomes cognitively bias human decision-making.
    Howard JJ; Rabbitt LR; Sirotin YB
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237855. PubMed ID: 32822441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Everyday amnesia: Residual memory for high confidence misses and implications for decision models of recognition.
    Berry CJ; Shanks DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jul; 153(7):1790-1815. PubMed ID: 38661632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image variability and face matching.
    Gogan T; Beaudry J; Oldmeadow J
    Perception; 2022 Nov; 51(11):804-819. PubMed ID: 35989636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the feature comparison strategy for forensic face identification.
    Towler A; White D; Kemp RI
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Mar; 23(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 28045276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The language of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses.
    Seale-Carlisle TM; Grabman JH; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Jun; 151(6):1283-1305. PubMed ID: 34855444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unfamiliar face matching ability predicts the slope of face learning.
    Baker KA; Mondloch CJ
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):5248. PubMed ID: 37002382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distinct abilities associated with matching same identity faces versus discriminating different faces: Evidence from individual differences in prosopagnosics and controls.
    Berger A; Fry R; Bobak AK; Juliano A; DeGutis J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Dec; 75(12):2256-2271. PubMed ID: 35034524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of filler similarity and lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Shen KJ; Huang J; Lam AL; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38573723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Holistic processing and unitization in face recognition memory.
    Meltzer MA; Bartlett JC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1386-1406. PubMed ID: 31259600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sizable difficulty in matching unfamiliar faces differing only moderately in orientation in depth is a function of image dissimilarity.
    Hacker CM; Biederman I; Zhu T; Nelken M; X Meschke E
    Vision Res; 2022 May; 194():107959. PubMed ID: 35182894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.