168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37473903)
1. Should we Oppose or Combine Waveforms for Spinal Cord Stimulation in PSPS-T2 Patients? A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial (MULTIWAVE Study).
Rigoard P; Ounajim A; Moens M; Goudman L; Roulaud M; Lorgeoux B; Baron S; Nivole K; Many M; Lampert L; David R; Billot M
J Pain; 2023 Dec; 24(12):2319-2339. PubMed ID: 37473903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of conventional, burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation on pain relief in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blinded cross-over trial (MULTIWAVE study).
Billot M; Naiditch N; Brandet C; Lorgeoux B; Baron S; Ounajim A; Roulaud M; Roy-Moreau A; de Montgazon G; Charrier E; Misbert L; Maillard B; Vendeuvre T; Rigoard P
Trials; 2020 Aug; 21(1):696. PubMed ID: 32746899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Multiple Waveforms on Patient Preferences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation for Leg and/or Back Pain.
Duse G; Reverberi C; Dario A
Neuromodulation; 2019 Feb; 22(2):200-207. PubMed ID: 30548106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparing Traditional Low-frequency Tonic Waveforms to Novel High Frequency and Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.
Morales A; Yong RJ; Kaye AD; Urman RD
Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2019 Mar; 23(4):25. PubMed ID: 30868285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proportion of clinical holistic responders in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome type II treated by subthreshold spinal cord stimulation compared to best medical treatment: a study protocol for a multicentric randomised controlled trial (TRADITION).
Goudman L; Putman K; Van Doorslaer L; Billot M; Roulaud M; Rigoard P; ; Moens M
Trials; 2023 Feb; 24(1):120. PubMed ID: 36803412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Paresthesia Mapping With Anatomic Placement in Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Long-Term Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover CRISP Study.
Al-Kaisy A; Baranidharan G; Sharon H; Palmisani S; Pang D; Will O; Wesley S; Crowther T; Ward K; Castino P; Raza A; Pathak YJ; Agnesi F; Yearwood T
Neuromodulation; 2022 Jan; 25(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 35041591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.
Kapural L; Yu C; Doust MW; Gliner BE; Vallejo R; Sitzman BT; Amirdelfan K; Morgan DM; Yearwood TL; Bundschu R; Yang T; Benyamin R; Burgher AH
Neurosurgery; 2016 Nov; 79(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 27584814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paresthesia-Independence: An Assessment of Technical Factors Related to 10 kHz Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation.
De Carolis G; Paroli M; Tollapi L; Doust MW; Burgher AH; Yu C; Yang T; Morgan DM; Amirdelfan K; Kapural L; Sitzman BT; Bundschu R; Vallejo R; Benyamin RM; Yearwood TL; Gliner BE; Powell AA; Bradley K
Pain Physician; 2017 May; 20(4):331-341. PubMed ID: 28535555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical Outcomes of 1 kHz Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Implanted Patients With Failed Paresthesia-Based Stimulation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
North JM; Hong KJ; Cho PY
Neuromodulation; 2016 Oct; 19(7):731-737. PubMed ID: 27186822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of different spinal cord stimulation paradigms for the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain (PARS-trial): study protocol for a double-blinded, randomized, and placebo-controlled crossover trial.
Ahmadi R; Campos B; Hajiabadi MM; Doerr-Harim C; Tenckhoff S; Rasche D; Unterberg A; Vesper J; Bruckner T; Tronnier V
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):87. PubMed ID: 33494781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Waves of Pain Relief: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Low Back and Leg Pain.
Head J; Mazza J; Sabourin V; Turpin J; Hoelscher C; Wu C; Sharan A
World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():264-274.e3. PubMed ID: 31369885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation vs. Association of Both in Patients with Refractory Chronic Back and/or Lower Limb Neuropathic Pain: An International, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover Trial (BOOST-DRG Study).
Rigoard P; Roulaud M; Goudman L; Adjali N; Ounajim A; Voirin J; Perruchoud C; Bouche B; Page P; Guillevin R; Naudin M; Simoneau M; Lorgeoux B; Baron S; Nivole K; Many M; Maitre I; Rigoard R; David R; Moens M; Billot M
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Dec; 58(1):. PubMed ID: 35056316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: 6-Month Australian Clinical Experience.
Russo M; Verrills P; Mitchell B; Salmon J; Barnard A; Santarelli D
Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):267-80. PubMed ID: 27228514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Paresthesia Mapping to Anatomical Placement in Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation: Initial Trial Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Crossover, CRISP Study.
Al-Kaisy A; Baranidharan G; Palmisani S; Pang D; Will O; Wesley S; Crowther T; Ward K; Castino P; Raza A; Agnesi F
Neuromodulation; 2020 Jul; 23(5):613-619. PubMed ID: 32166842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tonic spinal cord stimulation, high-frequency and burst stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a double-blind, randomised placebo controlled trial.
Kriek N; Groeneweg JG; Stronks DL; Huygen FJ
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():222. PubMed ID: 26303326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Novel, Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveform for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain: Six-Month Results of a Prospective, Single-Arm, Dose-Response Study.
Russo MA; Volschenk W; Bailey D; Santarelli DM; Holliday E; Barker D; Dizon J; Graham B
Neuromodulation; 2023 Oct; 26(7):1412-1423. PubMed ID: 37486284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination therapy with simultaneous delivery of spinal cord stimulation modalities: COMBO randomized controlled trial.
Wallace MS; North JM; Phillips GM; Calodney AK; Scowcroft JA; Popat-Lewis BU; Lee JM; Washabaugh EP; Paez J; Bolash RB; Noles J; Atallah J; Shah B; Ahadian FM; Trainor DM; Chen L; Jain R
Pain Manag; 2023 Mar; 13(3):171-184. PubMed ID: 36866658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Study protocol: Effects of active versus passive recharge burst spinal cord stimulation on pain experience in persistent spinal pain syndrome type 2: a multicentre randomized trial (BURST-RAP study).
Mons MR; Edelbroek C; Zuidema X; Bürger K; Elzinga L; de Vries J; van Kuijk S; Joosten EA; Kallewaard JW
Trials; 2022 Sep; 23(1):749. PubMed ID: 36064598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Paresthesia-Free High-Density Spinal Cord Stimulation for Postlaminectomy Syndrome in a Prescreened Population: A Prospective Case Series.
Sweet J; Badjatiya A; Tan D; Miller J
Neuromodulation; 2016 Apr; 19(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 26481726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidural Laterality and Pain Relief With Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation.
Mironer YE; Hutcheson JK; Haasis JC; Worobel MA; Sakla ES
Neuromodulation; 2023 Oct; 26(7):1465-1470. PubMed ID: 36180323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
