214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37475053)
21. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The tumor-stroma ratio is an independent predictor of survival in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following primary radical surgery.
Zong L; Zhang Q; Kong Y; Yang F; Zhou Y; Yu S; Wu M; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xiang Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):676-681. PubMed ID: 31882242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Preoperative serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen levels in clinical decision making for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Reesink-Peters N; van der Velden J; Ten Hoor KA; Boezen HM; de Vries EG; Schilthuis MS; Mourits MJ; Nijman HW; Aalders JG; Hollema H; Pras E; Duk JM; van der Zee AG
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 23(7):1455-62. PubMed ID: 15735121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Application of tumor markers CEA, TPA, and SCC-Ag in patients with low-risk FIGO stage IB and IIA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Juang CM; Wang PH; Yen MS; Lai CR; Ng HT; Yuan CC
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jan; 76(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10620449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Association of pretreatment SUV
Shou H; Yasuo Y; Yuan S; Lou H; Ni J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 152(1):112-117. PubMed ID: 33141954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Differential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy.
Chen JL; Huang CY; Huang YS; Chen RJ; Wang CW; Chen YH; Cheng JC; Cheng AL; Kuo SH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 24666257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Prognosis and Risk Stratification Based on Pelvic Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Li X; Wei LC; Zhang Y; Zhao LN; Li WW; Ping LJ; Dang YZ; Hu J; Shi M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 27400321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Prognostic value of tumor measurement parameters and SCC-Ag changes in patients with locally-advanced cervical cancer.
Chen W; Xiu S; Xie X; Guo H; Xu Y; Bai P; Xia X
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):6. PubMed ID: 35012582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of prognostic value of MRI and FIGO stage among patients with cervical carcinoma treated with radiotherapy.
Kodaira T; Fuwa N; Toita T; Nomoto Y; Kuzuya K; Tachibana H; Furutani K; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jul; 56(3):769-77. PubMed ID: 12788184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel prognostic nomogram utilizing the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer: A large multicenter study.
Tang X; Guo C; Liu S; Guo J; Hua K; Qiu J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 155(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 33587753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nomograms Predicting Survival of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Based on the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
Meng Q; Wang W; Liu X; Wang D; Zhang F
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():870670. PubMed ID: 35646645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. P63 and EGFR as prognostic predictors in stage IIB radiation-treated cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Cho NH; Kim YB; Park TK; Kim GE; Park K; Song KJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Nov; 91(2):346-53. PubMed ID: 14599865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Tumour size, volume, and marker expression during radiation therapy can predict survival of cervical cancer patients: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of KROG 16-01.
Lee JH; Lee SW; Kim JR; Kim YS; Yoon MS; Jeong S; Kim JH; Lee JY; Eom KY; Jeong BK; Lee SH
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 147(3):577-584. PubMed ID: 29110878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The prognostic value of histologic subtype in node-positive early-stage cervical cancer after hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy.
Zhou J; Zhang WW; Wu SG; He ZY; Sun JY; Yang GF; Li FY
Int J Surg; 2017 Aug; 44():1-6. PubMed ID: 28583891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prognostic value of post-radiation serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen and primary tumor regression for cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Wan Q; Yan W; Liu Y; Lin Y; Lu Z
Cancer Biomark; 2020; 29(3):327-335. PubMed ID: 32716344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A prognostic nomogram based on lymph node ratio for postoperative vulvar squamous cell carcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database: a retrospective cohort study.
Lei L; Tan L; Zhao X; Zeng F; Xu D
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Nov; 8(21):1382. PubMed ID: 33313127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The 5-year overall survival of cervical cancer in stage IIIC-r was little different to stage I and II: a retrospective analysis from a single center.
Yang E; Huang S; Ran X; Huang Y; Li Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33639874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pretreatment Factors Associated with Recurrence for Patients with Cervical Cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB1 Disease.
Liu SC; Huang EY; Hu CF; Ou YC; ChangChien CC; Wang CJ; Tsai CC; Fu HC; Wu CH; Lin H
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 26580917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
