117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37475147)
21. Medial olivocochlear reflex reliability: The effects of averaging and presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Skarzynski H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2150. PubMed ID: 36319248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Vohr BR; Folsom RC; Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B; Fletcher KA
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):425-42. PubMed ID: 11059702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.
Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Blankenship CM; Garinis AC; Putterman DB; Wróblewski M
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():117-139. PubMed ID: 30409510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure.
Lewis JD; Goettl-Meyer M; Lee D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Apr; 66(4):1428-1443. PubMed ID: 36940474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
Hoth S
Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Wen H; Szabo P; Cecola RP; Rigby P; Jackson DF
Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 71(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 8113128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Reliability of Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions Is Greater in Women than in Men.
Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Kochanek K; Skarzynski H
Audiol Res; 2022 Jan; 12(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 35200258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparisons of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions using chirp and click stimuli.
Keefe DH; Feeney MP; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Sep; 140(3):1949. PubMed ID: 27914441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.
Boothalingam S; Allan C; Allen P; Purcell DW
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519870942. PubMed ID: 31558110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Establishing critical differences in ear-canal stimulus amplitude for detecting middle ear muscle reflex activation during olivocochlear efferent measurements.
Mertes IB
Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31584306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Test-retest reliability of the acoustic stapedial reflex test in healthy neonates.
Mazlan R; Kei J; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 19322092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: evaluation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission, distortion product otoacoustic emission, and auditory brain stem response test performance.
Norton SJ; Gorga MP; Widen JE; Folsom RC; Sininger Y; Cone-Wesson B; Vohr BR; Mascher K; Fletcher K
Ear Hear; 2000 Oct; 21(5):508-28. PubMed ID: 11059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Contralateral modification of transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions].
Ganz M; von Specht H; Kevanishvili Z
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 May; 76(5):278-83. PubMed ID: 9280414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss.
Hussain DM; Gorga MP; Neely ST; Keefe DH; Peters J
Ear Hear; 1998 Dec; 19(6):434-49. PubMed ID: 9867292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in pre-school children.
Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 May; 132():109915. PubMed ID: 32028191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Contralateral Suppression of Transient-evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Leisure Noise Exposed Individuals.
Elangovan T; Selvarajan HG; McPherson B
Noise Health; 2022; 24(114):145-150. PubMed ID: 36124523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
Maxim T; Shera CA; Charaziak KK; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Standardization of the TEOAE Contralateral Suppression Test in Terms of Stimulus Intensity and Contralateral Noise Duration in Individuals with Normal Hearing.
Celikgun B; Derinsu U
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 35512841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
