These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65. Visual attention does not affect the reliability of otoacoustic emission or medial olivocochlear reflex. Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2398. PubMed ID: 36319231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Contralateral suppression of linear and nonlinear transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates at risk for hearing loss. Durante AS; Carvallo RM J Commun Disord; 2008; 41(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 17585930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Identifying Otosclerosis with Aural Acoustical Tests of Absorbance, Group Delay, Acoustic Reflex Threshold, and Otoacoustic Emissions. Keefe DH; Archer KL; Schmid KK; Fitzpatrick DF; Feeney MP; Hunter LL J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Oct; 28(9):838-860. PubMed ID: 28972472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a representative population sample aged 18 to 25 years. Ferguson MA; Smith PA; Davis AC; Lutman ME Audiology; 2000; 39(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 10905398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparison of neonatal transient evoked otoacoustic emission responses recorded with linear and QuickScreen protocols. Hatzopoulos S; Tsakanikos M; Grzanka A; Ratynska J; Martini A Audiology; 2000; 39(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 10882045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Synchronized Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions Provide a Signal-to-Noise Ratio Advantage in Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Assays. Lewis JD J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Feb; 19(1):53-65. PubMed ID: 29134475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Berlin CI; Hood LJ; Hurley AE; Wen H; Kemp DT Hear Res; 1995 Jul; 87(1-2):96-103. PubMed ID: 8567448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Acoustic stapedial reflexes in healthy neonates: normative data and test-retest reliability. Kei J J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 22284840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review. Liu J; Wang N Neural Regen Res; 2012 Apr; 7(11):853-61. PubMed ID: 25737714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. The relationship between auditory threshold and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Wagner W; Plinkert PK Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1999; 256(4):177-88. PubMed ID: 10337508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Data of contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for various noise signals. Kalaiah MK; Shastri U Data Brief; 2021 Oct; 38():107367. PubMed ID: 34568527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. The effect of coffee on contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Srivastava I; Kalaiah MK; Roushan R; Shastri U; Kumar K F1000Res; 2022; 11():878. PubMed ID: 37841827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Durante AS; Carvalho RM Int J Audiol; 2002 Jun; 41(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 12154810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]