184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37475493)
21. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Independent recalculation outperforms traditional measurement-based IMRT QA methods in detecting unacceptable plans.
Kry SF; Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Branco D; Mehrens H; Steinmann A; Followill DS
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3700-3708. PubMed ID: 31152568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A tool for patient-specific prediction of delivery discrepancies in machine parameters using trajectory log files.
Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J
Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):978-990. PubMed ID: 33332618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the use of trajectory log files for machine & patient specific QA.
Chuang KC; Giles W; Adamson J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2020 Dec; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 34037535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A hybrid method to improve efficiency of patient specific SRS and SBRT QA using 3D secondary dose verification.
Baltz GC; Manigold R; Seier R; Kirsner SM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 24(3):e13858. PubMed ID: 36583305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of a secondary dose check tool against Monte Carlo and analytical clinical dose calculation algorithms in VMAT.
Piffer S; Casati M; Marrazzo L; Arilli C; Calusi S; Desideri I; Fusi F; Pallotta S; Talamonti C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 22(4):52-62. PubMed ID: 33735491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. An independent Monte Carlo-based IMRT QA tool for a 0.35 T MRI-guided linear accelerator.
Khan AU; Simiele EA; Lotey R; DeWerd LA; Yadav P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 24(2):e13820. PubMed ID: 36325743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anatomy-based, patient-specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files.
Defoor DL; Vazquez-Quino LA; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5283. PubMed ID: 26103490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cardiac Dose Control and Optimization Strategy for Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy With Non-Uniform VMAT Technology.
Qiu J; Zhang S; Lv B; Zheng X
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211053752. PubMed ID: 34806481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems.
Hussein M; Rowshanfarzad P; Ebert MA; Nisbet A; Clark CH
Radiother Oncol; 2013 Dec; 109(3):370-6. PubMed ID: 24100148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Monte Carlo Dose Calculation and Elekta Log Files for Prostate Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy.
Katsuta Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Shimizu E; Matsunaga K; Sawada K; Matsushita H; Majima K; Jingu K
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 29334027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparing log file to measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance.
Chan LT; Tan YI; Tan PW; Leong YF; Khor JS; Teh MW; Cruz JFL; Baggarley SP; Ooi KH; Leong YH
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Mar; 46(1):303-311. PubMed ID: 36689188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An analysis of tolerance levels in IMRT quality assurance procedures.
Basran PS; Woo MK
Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2300-7. PubMed ID: 18649462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing measurement-derived (3DVH) and machine log file-derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries.
Tyagi N; Yang K; Yan D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 15(4):4645. PubMed ID: 25207396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating IMRT and VMAT dose accuracy: practical examples of failure to detect systematic errors when applying a commonly used metric and action levels.
Nelms BE; Chan MF; Jarry G; Lemire M; Lowden J; Hampton C; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111722. PubMed ID: 24320430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Treatment planning of VMAT and step-and-shoot IMRT delivery techniques for single fraction spine SBRT: An intercomparative dosimetric analysis and phantom-based quality assurance measurements.
Ouyang Z; LaHurd DV; Balagamwala EH; Chao ST; Suh JH; Xia P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 31821729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Online adaptation and verification of VMAT.
Crijns W; Defraene G; Van Herck H; Depuydt T; Haustermans K; Maes F; Van den Heuvel F
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3877-91. PubMed ID: 26133589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient-specific quality assurance for the delivery of (60)Co intensity modulated radiation therapy subject to a 0.35-T lateral magnetic field.
Li HH; Rodriguez VL; Green OL; Hu Y; Kashani R; Wooten HO; Yang D; Mutic S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jan; 91(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25442343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross verification of independent dose recalculation, log files based, and phantom measurement-based pretreatment quality assurance for volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Han C; Yi J; Zhu K; Zhou Y; Ai Y; Zheng X; Xie C; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 21(11):98-104. PubMed ID: 33001540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
