These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3747596)

  • 1. The evaluation of electromedical equipment in the United Kingdom; moving towards improved patient care?
    Drury PJ; Harston GA
    Life Support Syst; 1986; 4(2):99-101. PubMed ID: 3747596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromedical equipment evaluation: a new scheme in Sheffield.
    Johnson SG
    Biomed Eng; 1972 Dec; 7(11):530-2. PubMed ID: 4636170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Leakage currents in existing electromedical equipment.
    Raber MB; Jaques RE
    Can Hosp; 1973 Oct; 50(10):58-9. PubMed ID: 4781702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An instrument for testing electromedical equipment for safe performance.
    Brown MC; Johnson F; Roddy T; McDonald T
    Biomed Eng; 1974 Jan; 9(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 4811496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety of piped medical gases and electromedical equipment.
    Tompkin TL
    Br Med J; 1979 May; 1(6174):1354. PubMed ID: 445069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Safety of piped medical gases and electromedical equipment.
    Ward CS
    Br Med J; 1979 Apr; 1(6169):1019. PubMed ID: 435932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical engineering practices: maintenance and safety testing of common electromedical devices.
    Staewen WS
    Clin Eng; 1979; 7(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 10241600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of piped medical gases and electromedical equipment.
    Heaney GA
    Br Med J; 1979 May; 1(6174):1354. PubMed ID: 445068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Safety by design in electromedical equipment: Part I.
    Loznen SP
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Nov; 6(9):24-30. PubMed ID: 10158129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptance testing of medical electrical equipment.
    Whelpton D
    J Med Eng Technol; 1984; 8(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 6716444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Equipment re-use must be considered.
    Hilditch M
    Health Estate; 2006 Mar; 60(3):48-9. PubMed ID: 16555543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risks must be minimised.
    Bozec D
    Health Estate; 2005 Jun; 59(6):37-9. PubMed ID: 15977953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Faults found in electro-medical instruments.
    Pocock SN
    Biomed Eng; 1972 Dec; 7(11):533-7. PubMed ID: 4636171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety of portable electrical equipment.
    Pickford J
    Health Estate J; 1992 Nov; 46(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10122460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Safety by design in electromedical equipment, Part II.
    Loznen SP
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Dec; 6(10):28-30. PubMed ID: 10158121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Video colonoscope systems.
    Health Devices; 1994 May; 23(5):152-205. PubMed ID: 7852070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical electronics and patient safety.
    Griffith GC
    Calif Med; 1972 Jul; 117(1):55-6. PubMed ID: 5039805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Syringe pumps.
    Health Soc Serv J; 1982 Nov; 92(4821):1323-4. PubMed ID: 10262263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Medical equipment: United Kingdom. Part 1.
    Surg Bus; 1978 Jun; 41(6):64-6. PubMed ID: 10308574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient safety--class 3 equipment has advantages.
    Dobbie AK
    Biomed Eng; 1973 Jan; 8(1):20. PubMed ID: 4685288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.