163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37477101)
21. Vaginal Closure with EndoGIA to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Boyraz G; Karalok A; Basaran D; Turan T
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(4):602. PubMed ID: 30064005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Adenocarcinoma after Preoperative Brachytherapy in 10 Steps.
Colombo PE; Nguyen VH; Taoum C; Mourregot A; Neron M; Kerr C; Rouanet P; Carrier G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1138-1139. PubMed ID: 33031927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer by pulling the round ligament without a uterine manipulator.
Meng S; Li Z; Chen L; Yang X; Su P; Wang Y; Yi P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Sep; 264():31-35. PubMed ID: 34271363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator or vaginal tube use.
Yang EJ; Lee AJ; So KA; Lee SJ; Kim TJ; Shim SH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 34(5):e63. PubMed ID: 37170727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A; Biliatis I; Naik R; Bryant A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD006651. PubMed ID: 24085528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Safety and efficacy of a modified technique of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Yang N; Fan X; Wang L; Zhu P; Xu P
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2879-2887. PubMed ID: 36059077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clermont-Ferrand versus Vectec uterine manipulator for total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Misirlioglu S; Boza A; Urman B; Taskiran C
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2019 Feb; 28(1):51-56. PubMed ID: 29764264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the role of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Di Donato V; Muzii L; Casarin J; Ghezzi F; Malzoni M; Greggi S; Landoni F; Bazzurini L; Zanagnolo V; Multinu F; Angioli R; Plotti F; Caruso G; Fischetti M; Ferrandina G; Palaia I; Benedetti Panici P; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Aug; 275():64-69. PubMed ID: 35753229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Protective operative techniques in radical hysterectomy in early cervical carcinoma and their influence on disease-free and overall survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of risk groups.
Kampers J; Gerhardt E; Sibbertsen P; Flock T; Klapdor R; Hertel H; Jentschke M; Hillemanns P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Sep; 304(3):577-587. PubMed ID: 34021804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy without and with uterine manipulator combined with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early cervical cancer.
Zeng WH; Liang Y; Zhou JQ; Lin HH; Huang LS; He DF; Wen JZ; Wu BM; Liu HC; Zhong YX; Lei NX; Yang HK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Oct; 49(10):2468-2474. PubMed ID: 37488971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does the Use of a Uterine Manipulator or Intracorporeal Colpotomy Confer an Inferior Prognosis in Minimally Invasive Surgery-Treated Early-stage Cervical Cancer?
Wang R; Hu Y; Xia H; Zhu X
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 36410659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of Prognosis between Minimally Invasive and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Hashida S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
Curr Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(4):2272-2283. PubMed ID: 35448159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Laparoscopic type C1 hysterectomy based on the anatomic landmark of the uterus deep vein and its branches for cervical cancer].
Liang MR; Han DX; Jiang W; Liu H; Li L; Zhong ML; Luo L; Zeng SY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 40(4):288-294. PubMed ID: 29730917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Search for conditions to avoid parametrectomy during radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Ito F; Sugiura A; Toyoda S; Itani Y; Iwai K; Yamada Y; Tanase Y; Kawaguchi R; Kobayashi H; Kita T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Jul; 45(7):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 31106933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
