141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37478285)
1. Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity.
Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1248-1254. PubMed ID: 37478285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Ames Mutagenicity Prediction.
Martínez MJ; Sabando MV; Soto AJ; Roca C; Requena-Triguero C; Campillo NE; Páez JA; Ponzoni I
J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Dec; 62(24):6342-6351. PubMed ID: 36066065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple Instance Learning Improves Ames Mutagenicity Prediction for Problematic Molecular Species.
Feeney SV; Lui R; Guan D; Matthews S
Chem Res Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1227-1237. PubMed ID: 37477941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of the structural requirements for mutagencitiy, by incorporating molecular flexibility and metabolic activation of chemicals. II. General Ames mutagenicity model.
Serafimova R; Todorov M; Pavlov T; Kotov S; Jacob E; Aptula A; Mekenyan O
Chem Res Toxicol; 2007 Apr; 20(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 17381132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salmonella/human S9 mutagenicity test: a collaborative study with 58 compounds.
Hakura A; Shimada H; Nakajima M; Sui H; Kitamoto S; Suzuki S; Satoh T
Mutagenesis; 2005 May; 20(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 15843387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QSAR modeling without descriptors using graph convolutional neural networks: the case of mutagenicity prediction.
Hung C; Gini G
Mol Divers; 2021 Aug; 25(3):1283-1299. PubMed ID: 34146224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Could deep learning in neural networks improve the QSAR models?
Gini G; Zanoli F; Gamba A; Raitano G; Benfenati E
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2019 Sep; 30(9):617-642. PubMed ID: 31460798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative evaluation of 11 in silico models for the prediction of small molecule mutagenicity: role of steric hindrance and electron-withdrawing groups.
Ford KA; Ryslik G; Chan BK; Lewin-Koh SC; Almeida D; Stokes M; Gomez SR
Toxicol Mech Methods; 2017 Jan; 27(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 27813437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DeepAmes: A deep learning-powered Ames test predictive model with potential for regulatory application.
Li T; Liu Z; Thakkar S; Roberts R; Tong W
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Oct; 144():105486. PubMed ID: 37633327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Demystifying Multitask Deep Neural Networks for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
Xu Y; Ma J; Liaw A; Sheridan RP; Svetnik V
J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Oct; 57(10):2490-2504. PubMed ID: 28872869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks.
Tran TTV; Tayara H; Chong KT
Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jun; 176():108560. PubMed ID: 38754218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genotoxicity of apomorphine and various catecholamines in the Salmonella mutagenicity test (Ames test) and in tests for primary DNA damage using DNA repair-deficient B. subtilis strains (rec assay).
Suter W; Matter-Jaeger I
Mutat Res; 1984 Jul; 137(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 6431280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multitask deep learning with dynamic task balancing for quantum mechanical properties prediction.
Yang Z; Zhong W; Lv Q; Chen CY
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2022 Mar; 24(9):5383-5393. PubMed ID: 35169821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing machine-learning models for mutagenicity prediction through better feature selection.
Shinada NK; Koyama N; Ikemori M; Nishioka T; Hitaoka S; Hakura A; Asakura S; Matsuoka Y; Palaniappan SK
Mutagenesis; 2022 Oct; 37(3-4):191-202. PubMed ID: 35554560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A QSAR investigation of the role of hydrophobicity in regulating mutagenicity in the Ames test: 1. Mutagenicity of aromatic and heteroaromatic amines in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100.
Debnath AK; Debnath G; Shusterman AJ; Hansch C
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1992; 19(1):37-52. PubMed ID: 1732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Towards quantitative read across: Prediction of Ames mutagenicity in a large database.
Benigni R
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Nov; 108():104434. PubMed ID: 31374229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large-Scale Modeling of Multispecies Acute Toxicity End Points Using Consensus of Multitask Deep Learning Methods.
Jain S; Siramshetty VB; Alves VM; Muratov EN; Kleinstreuer N; Tropsha A; Nicklaus MC; Simeonov A; Zakharov AV
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Feb; 61(2):653-663. PubMed ID: 33533614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improvement of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) tools for predicting Ames mutagenicity: outcomes of the Ames/QSAR International Challenge Project.
Honma M; Kitazawa A; Cayley A; Williams RV; Barber C; Hanser T; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Myatt GJ; Cross KP; Benfenati E; Raitano G; Mekenyan O; Petkov P; Bossa C; Benigni R; Battistelli CL; Giuliani A; Tcheremenskaia O; DeMeo C; Norinder U; Koga H; Jose C; Jeliazkova N; Kochev N; Paskaleva V; Yang C; Daga PR; Clark RD; Rathman J
Mutagenesis; 2019 Mar; 34(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 30357358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mini mutagenicity test: a miniaturized version of the Ames test used in a prescreening assay for point mutagenesis assessment.
Flamand N; Meunier J; Meunier P; Agapakis-Caussé C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2001 Apr; 15(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 11287170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of QSAR models for predicting mutagenicity: outcome of the Second Ames/QSAR international challenge project.
Furuhama A; Kitazawa A; Yao J; Matos Dos Santos CE; Rathman J; Yang C; Ribeiro JV; Cross K; Myatt G; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Jeliazkova N; Saiakhov R; Chakravarti S; Foster RS; Bossa C; Battistelli CL; Benigni R; Sawada T; Wasada H; Hashimoto T; Wu M; Barzilay R; Daga PR; Clark RD; Mestres J; Montero A; Gregori-Puigjané E; Petkov P; Ivanova H; Mekenyan O; Matthews S; Guan D; Spicer J; Lui R; Uesawa Y; Kurosaki K; Matsuzaka Y; Sasaki S; Cronin MTD; Belfield SJ; Firman JW; Spînu N; Qiu M; Keca JM; Gini G; Li T; Tong W; Hong H; Liu Z; Igarashi Y; Yamada H; Sugiyama KI; Honma M
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2023; 34(12):983-1001. PubMed ID: 38047445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
