These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3747888)

  • 1. Mammography in 1986: keeping abreast of the times.
    Kearsley JH
    Med J Aust; 1986 Sep; 145(5):181-2. PubMed ID: 3747888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case for.
    Warren R
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):969-70. PubMed ID: 3142571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against.
    Skrabanek P
    BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):971-2. PubMed ID: 3142572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The technology of mammography. Misunderstood and underutilized.
    Fox SA; Kimme-Smith C; Klos DS
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1988; 4(4):521-44. PubMed ID: 10291098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Norwegian consensus conference on mammography. Consensus statement.
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1991; 7(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 2032780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer screening and management.
    Forrest AP; Anderson ED
    Med J Aust; 1999 Nov; 171(9):479-84. PubMed ID: 10615342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The risks and benefits of screening mammography.
    Health Technol; 1987; 1(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 10295360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of mammography in breast cancer prevention.
    Whitman GJ
    Curr Opin Oncol; 1999 Sep; 11(5):414-8. PubMed ID: 10505782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1993 Oct; 42(38):737-41. PubMed ID: 8371707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mammography and clinical breast examinations among women aged 50 years and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1992.
    JAMA; 1993 Oct; 270(15):1792-3. PubMed ID: 8411512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screening for breast cancer with mammography in Bohuslän County, Sweden.
    Regnér H
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():60-4. PubMed ID: 2236863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography screening is not as good as we hoped.
    Jørgensen KJ
    Maturitas; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Re: Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.
    Feig SA; Sickles EA; Evans WP; Linver MN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Aug; 96(16):1260-1; author reply 1261. PubMed ID: 15316065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the right cancer screening rate?
    Harris R
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(9):732-4. PubMed ID: 10787367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of mammography and mammary serum antigen estimation for breast cancer screening.
    Ward BG; Joy GJ; Ramm LE; Baker CA; McGuckin MA
    Med J Aust; 1992 Aug; 157(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1635488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of estrogen on screening mammography: another complexity.
    Black WC; Fletcher SW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):627-8. PubMed ID: 8627634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of false-positive screening mammograms on rescreening in Western Australia.
    Dunn NA
    Med J Aust; 2012 Nov; 197(9):490-1. PubMed ID: 23121577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammography in younger women: the dilemma of diminishing returns.
    Calonge N
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):668-9. PubMed ID: 20439837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health technology assessment and screening in The Netherlands: case studies of mammography in breast cancer, PSA screening in prostate cancer, and ultrasound in normal pregnancy.
    Banta HD; Oortwiin W
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 11495380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan].
    Yamada T; Suzuki A
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.