These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A Retrospective Case Series of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulator Trial Technique with Less Displacement and Migration of the Trial Leads. Shaparin N; Gritsenko K; Agrawal P; Kim S; Wahezi S; Gitkind A; Hascalovici J; Vydyanathan A; Bernstein J; Dizdarevic A; Mehta N; Kaufman A Pain Res Manag; 2019; 2019():1236430. PubMed ID: 31281554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and Risk Factors for Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Migration With or Without Loss of Efficacy: A Retrospective Review of 91 Consecutive Thoracic Lead Implants. Dombovy-Johnson ML; D'Souza RS; Ha CT; Hagedorn JM Neuromodulation; 2022 Jul; 25(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35803679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rates of lead migration and stimulation loss in spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective comparison of laminotomy versus percutaneous implantation. Kim DD; Vakharyia R; Kroll HR; Shuster A Pain Physician; 2011; 14(6):513-24. PubMed ID: 22086092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevention of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation electrode migration: a 15-year experience. North RB; Recinos VR; Attenello FJ; Shipley J; Long DM Neuromodulation; 2014 Oct; 17(7):670-6; discussion 676-7. PubMed ID: 24512097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Retrospective Review of Lead Migration Rate in Patients Permanently Implanted with Percutaneous Leads and a 10 kHz SCS Device. Gupta M; Abd-Elsayed A; Hughes M; Rotte A Pain Res Manag; 2021; 2021():6639801. PubMed ID: 33613793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A case series review of spinal cord stimulation migration rates with a novel fixation device. Justiz R; Bentley I Neuromodulation; 2014 Jan; 17(1):37-40; discussion 40-1. PubMed ID: 23294189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Trials and Implantations. Moeschler SM; Warner NS; Lamer TJ; Bendel MA; Warner MA; Eldrige JS; Mauck WD; Gazelka HM; Kor DJ; Hoelzer BC Pain Med; 2016 Nov; 17(11):2076-2081. PubMed ID: 27296055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical paddle-lead placement for screening trials of spinal cord stimulation. Pahapill PA Neuromodulation; 2014 Jun; 17(4):346-8; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 23815416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The utility of bone cement to prevent lead migration with minimally invasive placement of spinal cord stimulator laminectomy leads. Connor DE; Cangiano-Heath A; Brown B; Vidrine R; Battley T; Nanda A; Guthikonda B Neurosurgery; 2012 Jul; 71(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 22314753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of percutaneous and paddle lead implantation for spinal cord stimulation: a comparative analysis of complications, reoperation rates, and health-care costs. Babu R; Hazzard MA; Huang KT; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M; Lad SP Neuromodulation; 2013; 16(5):418-26; discussion 426-7. PubMed ID: 23647789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prospective evaluation of safety and success of a new method of introducing percutaneous paddle leads and complex arrays with an epidural access system. Deer T; Bowman R; Schocket SM; Kim C; Ranson M; Amirdelfan K; Raso L Neuromodulation; 2012; 15(1):21-9; discussion 29-30. PubMed ID: 22296616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of spinal canal diameter in the placement of thoracic spinal cord stimulator paddle leads. Ragel BT; Riedman T; McGehee M; Raslan AM Pain Pract; 2024 Jan; 24(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 37626446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]