146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37479348)
1. Why are peer reviewers thinning out, and are there ways to enrich the peer pool?
Teixeira da Silva JA
J Sci Med Sport; 2023 Jul; 26(7):336-337. PubMed ID: 37479348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The bane of publishing a research article in international journals by African researchers, the peer-review process and the contentious issue of predatory journals: a commentary.
Tarkang EE; Bain LE
Pan Afr Med J; 2019; 32():119. PubMed ID: 31223409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Problem Is Not Professional Publishing, But the Publish-or-Perish Culture.
Génova G; de la Vara JL
Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Apr; 25(2):617-619. PubMed ID: 29350352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment.
Zaharie MA; Seeber M
Scientometrics; 2018; 117(3):1587-1609. PubMed ID: 30546171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. We need to talk about peer-review-Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation.
Ellwanger JH; Chies JAB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():201-205. PubMed ID: 32061827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.
Gasparyan AY; Gerasimov AN; Voronov AA; Kitas GD
J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Apr; 30(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 25829801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is the Continued Claim of Indexing in Publons by Journals a Predatory Publishing Characteristic?
Teixeira da Silva JA
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2023; 52(5):448-449. PubMed ID: 37474403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why should early-career scientists publish in society journals.
Dolan SK; Banks LD; Yu W
mBio; 2024 Jan; 15(1):e0199423. PubMed ID: 38088905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Having a Mentor or a Doctoral Degree Is Helpful for Mid-Career Physicians to Publish Papers in Peer-Reviewed Journals.
Takenoshita S; Nomura K; Ohde S; Deshpande GA; Sakamoto H; Yoshida H; Urayama K; Bito S; Ishida Y; Shimbo T; Matsui K; Fukui T; Takahashi O
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2016 Aug; 239(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 27523811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predatory publishing or a lack of peer review transparency?-a contemporary analysis of indexed open and non-open access articles in paediatric urology.
O'Kelly F; Fernandez N; Koyle MA
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Apr; 15(2):159.e1-159.e7. PubMed ID: 30867116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Why Participate in Peer Review?
Kerig PK
J Trauma Stress; 2021 Feb; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 33442940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Innovative Strategies for Peer Review.
Barroga E
J Korean Med Sci; 2020 May; 35(20):e138. PubMed ID: 32449322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Journal policies and editors' opinions on peer review.
Hamilton DG; Fraser H; Hoekstra R; Fidler F
Elife; 2020 Nov; 9():. PubMed ID: 33211009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Why do peer reviewers decline to review? A survey.
Tite L; Schroter S
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2007 Jan; 61(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 17183008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher.
Henriquez T
mBio; 2023 Oct; 14(5):e0194823. PubMed ID: 37811986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models.
Kowalczuk MK; Dudbridge F; Nanda S; Harriman SL; Patel J; Moylan EC
BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008707. PubMed ID: 26423855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
Teixeira da Silva JA; Al-Khatib A
Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Feb; 24(1):275-285. PubMed ID: 28155093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial: Where have all the reviewers gone?: Is the peer review concept in crisis?
DeLisi LE
Psychiatry Res; 2022 Apr; 310():114454. PubMed ID: 35219266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preprints: a Timely Counterbalance for Big Data-Driven Research.
Verma AA; Detsky AS
J Gen Intern Med; 2020 Jul; 35(7):2179-2181. PubMed ID: 32141042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
