135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37480301)
1. The impact of an active and passive industrial back exoskeleton on functional performance.
Govaerts R; De Bock S; Provyn S; Vanderborght B; Roelands B; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
Ergonomics; 2024 May; 67(5):597-618. PubMed ID: 37480301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluating cognitive and physical work performance: A comparative study of an active and passive industrial back-support exoskeleton.
Govaerts R; Turcksin T; Vanderborght B; Roelands B; Meeusen R; De Pauw K; De Bock S
Wearable Technol; 2023; 4():e27. PubMed ID: 38487761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectivity of a passive arm support exoskeleton in reducing muscle activation and perceived exertion during plastering activities.
de Vries AW; Krause F; de Looze MP
Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):712-721. PubMed ID: 33402050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton for Manual Materials Handling: Reduction of Low Back Loading and Metabolic Effort during Repetitive Lifting.
Schmalz T; Colienne A; Bywater E; Fritzsche L; Gärtner C; Bellmann M; Reimer S; Ernst M
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2022; 10(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 34763618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Objective and Subjective Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Overhead Work.
Maurice P; Camernik J; Gorjan D; Schirrmeister B; Bornmann J; Tagliapietra L; Latella C; Pucci D; Fritzsche L; Ivaldi S; Babic J
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Jan; 28(1):152-164. PubMed ID: 31581086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.
de Looze MP; Bosch T; Krause F; Stadler KS; O'Sullivan LW
Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):671-81. PubMed ID: 26444053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic and Static Assistive Strategies for a Tailored Occupational Back-Support Exoskeleton: Assessment on Real Tasks Carried Out by Railway Workers.
Di Natali C; Poliero T; Fanti V; Sposito M; Caldwell DG
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of industrial back-support exoskeletons on body loading and user experience: an updated systematic review.
Kermavnar T; de Vries AW; de Looze MP; O'Sullivan LW
Ergonomics; 2021 Jun; 64(6):685-711. PubMed ID: 33369518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of a battery of tests for functional evaluation of trunk exoskeletons.
Kozinc Ž; Baltrusch S; Houdijk H; Šarabon N
Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103117. PubMed ID: 32342882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In-Field Training of a Passive Back Exoskeleton Changes the Biomechanics of Logistic Workers.
Schrøder Jakobsen L; Samani A; Desbrosses K; de Zee M; Madeleine P
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 38869954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using a Back Exoskeleton During Industrial and Functional Tasks-Effects on Muscle Activity, Posture, Performance, Usability, and Wearer Discomfort in a Laboratory Trial.
Luger T; Bär M; Seibt R; Rieger MA; Steinhilber B
Hum Factors; 2023 Feb; 65(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 33861139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-Term Effects of a Passive Spinal Exoskeleton on Functional Performance, Discomfort and User Satisfaction in Patients with Low Back Pain.
Kozinc Ž; Baltrusch S; Houdijk H; Šarabon N
J Occup Rehabil; 2021 Mar; 31(1):142-152. PubMed ID: 32356222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals.
Baltrusch SJ; van Dieën JH; van Bennekom CAM; Houdijk H
Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():94-106. PubMed ID: 29885731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model-Based Comparison of Passive and Active Assistance Designs in an Occupational Upper Limb Exoskeleton for Overhead Lifting.
Zhou X; Zheng L
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2021; 9(3-4):167-185. PubMed ID: 34254566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of a passive exoskeleton on muscle activity, discomfort and endurance time in forward bending work.
Bosch T; van Eck J; Knitel K; de Looze M
Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():212-7. PubMed ID: 26851481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Towards a Functional Performance Validation Standard for Industrial Low-Back Exoskeletons: State of the Art Review.
Pesenti M; Antonietti A; Gandolla M; Pedrocchi A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33530377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical Consequences of Using Passive and Active Back-Support Exoskeletons during Different Manual Handling Tasks.
Schwartz M; Desbrosses K; Theurel J; Mornieux G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jul; 20(15):. PubMed ID: 37569010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A physiological and biomechanical investigation of three passive upper-extremity exoskeletons during simulated overhead work.
Weston EB; Alizadeh M; Hani H; Knapik GG; Souchereau RA; Marras WS
Ergonomics; 2022 Jan; 65(1):105-117. PubMed ID: 34338595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effectiveness research.
Howard J; Murashov VV; Lowe BD; Lu ML
Am J Ind Med; 2020 Mar; 63(3):201-208. PubMed ID: 31828844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
