186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37481071)
1. A Comparative Analysis of Data Analysis Tools for Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.
Zhang F; Ge W; Huang L; Li D; Liu L; Dong Z; Xu L; Ding X; Zhang C; Sun Y; A J; Gao J; Guo T
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2023 Sep; 22(9):100623. PubMed ID: 37481071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics and Software Tools: A Glimpse in 2020.
Zhang F; Ge W; Ruan G; Cai X; Guo T
Proteomics; 2020 Sep; 20(17-18):e1900276. PubMed ID: 32275110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking commonly used software suites and analysis workflows for DIA proteomics and phosphoproteomics.
Lou R; Cao Y; Li S; Lang X; Li Y; Zhang Y; Shui W
Nat Commun; 2023 Jan; 14(1):94. PubMed ID: 36609502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QuantPipe: A User-Friendly Pipeline Software Tool for DIA Data Analysis Based on the OpenSWATH-PyProphet-TRIC Workflow.
Wang D; Gan G; Chen X; Zhong CQ
J Proteome Res; 2021 Jan; 20(1):1096-1102. PubMed ID: 33091296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extensive and Accurate Benchmarking of DIA Acquisition Methods and Software Tools Using a Complex Proteomic Standard.
Gotti C; Roux-Dalvai F; Joly-Beauparlant C; Mangnier L; Leclercq M; Droit A
J Proteome Res; 2021 Oct; 20(10):4801-4814. PubMed ID: 34472865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acquisition and Analysis of DIA-Based Proteomic Data: A Comprehensive Survey in 2023.
Lou R; Shui W
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2024 Feb; 23(2):100712. PubMed ID: 38182042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benchmarking Bioinformatics Pipelines in Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Immunopeptidomics.
Shahbazy M; Ramarathinam SH; Illing PT; Jappe EC; Faridi P; Croft NP; Purcell AW
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2023 Apr; 22(4):100515. PubMed ID: 36796644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility, Specificity and Accuracy of Relative Quantification Using Spectral Library-based Data-independent Acquisition.
Barkovits K; Pacharra S; Pfeiffer K; Steinbach S; Eisenacher M; Marcus K; Uszkoreit J
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2020 Jan; 19(1):181-197. PubMed ID: 31699904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based quantification workflow for proteome analysis of 5000 cells.
Jiang N; Gao Y; Xu J; Luo F; Zhang X; Chen R
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2022 Jul; 216():114795. PubMed ID: 35489320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of Cerebrospinal Fluid via Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.
Barkovits K; Linden A; Galozzi S; Schilde L; Pacharra S; Mollenhauer B; Stoepel N; Steinbach S; May C; Uszkoreit J; Eisenacher M; Marcus K
J Proteome Res; 2018 Oct; 17(10):3418-3430. PubMed ID: 30207155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DIA proteomics data from a UPS1-spiked
Gotti C; Roux-Dalvai F; Joly-Beauparlant C; Mangnier L; Leclercq M; Droit A
Data Brief; 2022 Apr; 41():107829. PubMed ID: 35198661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. dia-PASEF data analysis using FragPipe and DIA-NN for deep proteomics of low sample amounts.
Demichev V; Szyrwiel L; Yu F; Teo GC; Rosenberger G; Niewienda A; Ludwig D; Decker J; Kaspar-Schoenefeld S; Lilley KS; Mülleder M; Nesvizhskii AI; Ralser M
Nat Commun; 2022 Jul; 13(1):3944. PubMed ID: 35803928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification.
Navarro P; Kuharev J; Gillet LC; Bernhardt OM; MacLean B; Röst HL; Tate SA; Tsou CC; Reiter L; Distler U; Rosenberger G; Perez-Riverol Y; Nesvizhskii AI; Aebersold R; Tenzer S
Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Nov; 34(11):1130-1136. PubMed ID: 27701404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methods for SWATH™: Data Independent Acquisition on TripleTOF Mass Spectrometers.
Holewinski RJ; Parker SJ; Matlock AD; Venkatraman V; Van Eyk JE
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1410():265-79. PubMed ID: 26867750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of DDA Library-Free Strategies for Phosphoproteomics and Ubiquitinomics Data-Independent Acquisition Data.
Wen C; Wu X; Lin G; Yan W; Gan G; Xu X; Chen XY; Chen X; Liu X; Fu G; Zhong CQ
J Proteome Res; 2023 Jul; 22(7):2232-2245. PubMed ID: 37256709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of In Silico Predicted Spectral Libraries in Data-Independent Acquisition Data Analysis Workflows.
Staes A; Mendes Maia T; Dufour S; Bouwmeester R; Gabriels R; Martens L; Gevaert K; Impens F; Devos S
J Proteome Res; 2024 Jun; 23(6):2078-2089. PubMed ID: 38666436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational Optimization of Spectral Library Size Improves DIA-MS Proteome Coverage and Applications to 15 Tumors.
Ge W; Liang X; Zhang F; Hu Y; Xu L; Xiang N; Sun R; Liu W; Xue Z; Yi X; Sun Y; Wang B; Zhu J; Lu C; Zhan X; Chen L; Wu Y; Zheng Z; Gong W; Wu Q; Yu J; Ye Z; Teng X; Huang S; Zheng S; Liu T; Yuan C; Guo T
J Proteome Res; 2021 Dec; 20(12):5392-5401. PubMed ID: 34748352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies for consistent and automated quantification of HDL proteome using data-independent acquisition.
Souza Junior DR; Silva ARM; Ronsein GE
J Lipid Res; 2023 Jul; 64(7):100397. PubMed ID: 37286042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Untargeted, spectral library-free analysis of data-independent acquisition proteomics data generated using Orbitrap mass spectrometers.
Tsou CC; Tsai CF; Teo GC; Chen YJ; Nesvizhskii AI
Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 16(15-16):2257-71. PubMed ID: 27246681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New targeted approaches for the quantification of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
Bruderer R; Sondermann J; Tsou CC; Barrantes-Freer A; Stadelmann C; Nesvizhskii AI; Schmidt M; Reiter L; Gomez-Varela D
Proteomics; 2017 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 28319648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
