These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37483065)

  • 41. In the eye of the beholder - how course delivery affects anatomy education.
    Banovac I; Kovačić N; Hladnik A; Blažević A; Bičanić I; Petanjek Z; Katavić V
    Ann Anat; 2023 Feb; 246():152043. PubMed ID: 36549401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of collaborative learning and self-organisation on medical students' academic performance in anatomy.
    Knof H; Berndt M; Shiozawa T
    Ann Anat; 2024 Jan; 251():152182. PubMed ID: 37879501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Virtual Dissection: An Interactive Anatomy Learning Tool.
    Wainman B; Aggarwal A; Birk SK; Gill JS; Hass KS; Fenesi B
    Anat Sci Educ; 2021 Nov; 14(6):788-798. PubMed ID: 33185976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students.
    Johnston AN; Hamill J; Barton MJ; Baldwin S; Percival J; Williams-Pritchard G; Salvage-Jones J; Todorovic M
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2015 Nov; 15(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 26027548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Analysis of traditional versus three-dimensional augmented curriculum on anatomical learning outcome measures.
    Peterson DC; Mlynarczyk GS
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 27078503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Musculoskeletal anatomy: evaluation and comparison of common teaching and learning modalities.
    Zibis A; Mitrousias V; Varitimidis S; Raoulis V; Fyllos A; Arvanitis D
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1517. PubMed ID: 33452299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Building an open academic environment - a new approach to empowering students in their learning of anatomy through 'Shadow Modules'.
    Scott JL; Moxham BJ; Rutherford SM
    J Anat; 2014 Mar; 224(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 24117249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Head to head: The role of academic competition in undergraduate anatomical education.
    Van Nuland SE; Roach VA; Wilson TD; Belliveau DJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 25319077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An investigation into medical students' approaches to anatomy learning in a systems-based prosection course.
    Smith CF; Mathias H
    Clin Anat; 2007 Oct; 20(7):843-8. PubMed ID: 17708560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Learning and study strategies correlate with medical students' performance in anatomical sciences.
    Khalil MK; Williams SE; Gregory Hawkins H
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):236-242. PubMed ID: 28940743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Medical students' perceptions and performance in an online regional anatomy course during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Zhang JF; Zilundu PLM; Fu R; Zheng XF; Zhou LH; Guo GQ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2022 Aug; 15(5):928-942. PubMed ID: 35766990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Is exam performance in anatomy influenced by teaching with prosected cadavers? An evidence-based study.
    Harris JA; Adey TL; McKay DW
    Clin Anat; 2020 Sep; 33(6):969-974. PubMed ID: 32519341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Role of Anatomy Computer-Assisted Learning on Spatial Abilities of Medical Students.
    Guimarães B; Firmino-Machado J; Tsisar S; Viana B; Pinto-Sousa M; Vieira-Marques P; Cruz-Correia R; Ferreira MA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Mar; 12(2):138-153. PubMed ID: 29762903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
    Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Student perceptions of independent versus facilitated small group learning approaches to compressed medical anatomy education.
    Whelan A; Leddy JJ; Mindra S; Matthew Hughes JD; El-Bialy S; Ramnanan CJ
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 26040541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The ATLAS project: The effects of a constructionist digital laboratory project on undergraduate laboratory performance.
    Shoepe TC; Cavedon DK; Derian JM; Levy CS; Morales A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 24678042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of curricular reform on gross anatomy laboratory examination performance: An institutional analysis.
    Taylor MA; Loder DM; Herr MJ; Nichols RA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2023 Jan; 16(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 35603528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The impact of asynchronous online anatomy teaching and smaller learning groups in the anatomy laboratory on medical students' performance during the Covid-19 pandemic.
    Chang MF; Liao ML; Lue JH; Yeh CC
    Anat Sci Educ; 2022 May; 15(3):476-492. PubMed ID: 35291048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.
    Estai M; Bunt S
    Ann Anat; 2016 Nov; 208():151-157. PubMed ID: 26996541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Spatial Abilities and Performance in Anatomy for Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy Doctoral Students.
    Baumgartner MR; Dombkowski RA; Ruediger TM; Almonroeder TG
    J Allied Health; 2023; 52(3):e149-e153. PubMed ID: 37728364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.