These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3748485)
1. Which diphosphonate for routine bone scintigraphy (MDP, HDP or DPD)? Frühling J; Verbist A; Balikdjian D Nucl Med Commun; 1986 Jun; 7(6):415-25. PubMed ID: 3748485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between the diagnostic efficacy of 99mTc-MDP, 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-HDP for the detection of bone metastases. Pauwels EK; Blom J; Camps JA; Hermans J; Rijke AM Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 6220908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication. Buell U; Kleinhans E; Zorn-Bopp E; Reuschel W; Muenzing W; Moser EA; Seiderer M J Nucl Med; 1982 Mar; 23(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 6460854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of bone scintigraphy with 99Tcm-DPD, 99Tcm-HDP and 99Tcm-MDP. Bergqvist L; Brismar J; Cederquist E; Darte L; Naversten Y; Palmer J Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 6236672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical comparison of 99mTc-DPD and two 99mTc-MDP agents. Vorne M; Vähätalo S; Lantto T Eur J Nucl Med; 1983; 8(9):395-7. PubMed ID: 6226527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 99Tcm-MDP and 99Tcm-DPD in pathologic bone lesions. A visual and quantitative comparison. Lantto T; Vorne M; Mokka R; Vähätalo S Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):631-3. PubMed ID: 2960361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate. Subramanian G; McAfee JG; Thomas FD; Feld TA; Zapf-Longo C; Palladino E Radiology; 1983 Dec; 149(3):823-8. PubMed ID: 6316414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Technetium-99m MDP vs technetium-99m dicarboxypropane diphosphonate. A clinical comparison in various pathologic conditions. Godart G; Durez M; Bevilacqua M; Abramovici J; Robience Y Clin Nucl Med; 1986 Feb; 11(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 3769350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biokinetics of bone tracers by means of deconvolution analysis--comparison of 99mTc MDP, 99mTc DPD and 99mTc EHDP. Knop J; Stritzke P; Kröger E; Schneider C; Wasmus G Nuklearmedizin; 1982 Aug; 21(4):145-9. PubMed ID: 6216459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of different bone tracers and acquisition times on image quality of equine bone scintigraphy. Mageed M; Dyab S; Swagemakers JH; Gerlach K Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2022 Sep; 63(5):593-600. PubMed ID: 35666549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The visualization of femoral vessels in delayed bone scans--a sign of arteriosclerosis? A comparison of 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-DPD. Lantto T; Järvi K; Toivio I; Vähätalo S; Vorne M Eur J Nucl Med; 1989; 15(5):265-8. PubMed ID: 2759127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer analysis of Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP kinetics in humans: concise communication. Mele M; Conte E; Fratello A; Pasculli D; Pieralice M; D'Addabbo A J Nucl Med; 1983 Apr; 24(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 6834136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical comparison of MDP and DMAD. Rosenthall L; Stern J; Arzoumanian A Clin Nucl Med; 1982 Sep; 7(9):403-6. PubMed ID: 6214358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tc-99m MDP, HMDP, and DPD with respect to bone-to-soft tissue ratios. Buell U; Kirsch CM; Kleinhans E; Jäger B J Nucl Med; 1983 Dec; 24(12):1201-2. PubMed ID: 6227711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the kinetics of methylene-diphosphonate (MDP) and dicarboxypropan-diphosphonic acid (DPD), two radio-diagnostics for bone scintigraphy. Schroth HJ; Hausinger F; Garth H; Oberhausen E Eur J Nucl Med; 1984; 9(12):529-32. PubMed ID: 6526051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical evaluation of 99mTc-hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HMDP) bone scintigraphy: comparison with 99mTc-MDP (author's transl)]. Honda H; Oshiumi Y; Kamoi I; Ichiya Y; Wada M; Matsuura K Kaku Igaku; 1981 Nov; 18(9):1315-9. PubMed ID: 6461790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of a technetium-99m bone imaging agent based on the vicinal diphosphonate 1,2-diphosphonoethyleneglycol (DPEG). Pauwels EK; Camps JA; Blom J; Hermans J; Kelly JD; Cumming SA; Blackburn GM; Rashid A Nucl Med Commun; 1985 Nov; 6(11):739-45. PubMed ID: 3831848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Four cases of diffuse bone metastasis with increased uptake in 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy]. Dannoura R; Morita S; Kikuchi S; Ohta M; Ohtake H Kaku Igaku; 1984 Nov; 21(11):1521-5. PubMed ID: 6241644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Relative lesion detection ability of Tc-99m HMDP and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication. Van Duzee BF; Schaefer JA; Ball JD; Chilton HM; Cowan RJ; Kuni C; Trow R; Watson NE J Nucl Med; 1984 Feb; 25(2):166-9. PubMed ID: 6233404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the effect of 99mTc-DPD and 99mTc-MDP on experimentally-induced osteoarthritis in the stifle joint of the dog. Lee JY; Lee WG; Kim JH; Kang SS; Bae CS; Koong SS; Choi SH In Vivo; 2005; 19(4):781-5. PubMed ID: 15999549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]