205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37485920)
1. Minimally invasive versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen L; Xia N; Wang Z; Junjie X; Tian B
Int J Surg; 2023 Jul; 109(7):2058-2069. PubMed ID: 37485920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Total Pancreatectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
Scholten L; Klompmaker S; Van Hilst J; Annecchiarico MM; Balzano G; Casadei R; Fabre JM; Falconi M; Ferrari G; Kerem M; Khatkov IE; Lombardo C; Manzoni A; Mazzola M; Napoli N; Rosso EE; Tyutyunnik P; Wellner UF; Fuks D; Burdio F; Keck T; Hilal MA; Besselink MG; Boggi U;
Ann Surg; 2023 Feb; 277(2):313-320. PubMed ID: 34261885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for total pancreatectomy: a bibliometric review and meta-analysis.
Wei K; Cheng L; Zheng Q; Tian J; Liu R; Hackert T
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Jul; 25(7):723-731. PubMed ID: 37032259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Minimally Invasive Pancreatectomies for Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms of the Pancreas.
Tan HL; Syn N; Goh BKP
Pancreas; 2019; 48(10):1334-1342. PubMed ID: 31688598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic versus open total pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chaouch MA; Gouader A; Mazzotta A; Costa AC; Krimi B; Rahbari N; Mehrabi A; Reissfelder C; Soubrane O; Oweira H
J Robot Surg; 2023 Aug; 17(4):1259-1270. PubMed ID: 36920720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patients get more long-term benefit from central pancreatectomy than distal resection: a meta-analysis.
Xu SB; Zhu YP; Zhou W; Xie K; Mou YP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 39(6):567-74. PubMed ID: 23465182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang J; Wu WM; You L; Zhao YP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Jun; 20(6):1774-80. PubMed ID: 23504140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy of Nonductal Adenocarcinomatous Pancreatic Tumor (NDACPT) in the Pancreatic Body and Tail.
Yi X; Chen S; Wang W; Zou L; Diao D; Zheng Y; He Y; Li H; Luo L; Xiong W; Wan J
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Aug; 27(4):206-219. PubMed ID: 28520652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do patients benefit more from robot assisted approach than conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? A meta-analysis of perioperative and economic outcomes.
Xu SB; Jia CK; Wang JR; Zhang RC; Mou YP
J Formos Med Assoc; 2019 Jan; 118(1 Pt 2):268-278. PubMed ID: 29798819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Does splenic vessel preservation have better postoperative outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Elabbasy F; Gadde R; Hanna MM; Sleeman D; Livingstone A; Yakoub D
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2015 Aug; 14(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 26256077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcomes after distal pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine neoplasms: a retrospective comparison between minimally invasive and open approach using propensity score weighting.
Partelli S; Andreasi V; Rancoita PMV; Perez-Sanchez E; Muffatti F; Balzano G; Crippa S; Di Serio C; Falconi M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):165-173. PubMed ID: 31953734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally-invasive versus open pancreatic enucleation: systematic review and metanalysis of short-term outcomes.
Roesel R; Bernardi L; Bonino MA; Popeskou SG; Garofalo F; Cristaudi A
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Jun; 25(6):603-613. PubMed ID: 36958987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis.
Sui CJ; Li B; Yang JM; Wang SJ; Zhou YM
Asian J Surg; 2012 Jan; 35(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22726557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fibrin sealants for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatic surgery.
Deng Y; He S; Cheng Y; Cheng N; Gong J; Gong J; Zeng Z; Zhao L
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Mar; 3(3):CD009621. PubMed ID: 32157697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Minimally invasive versus open central pancreatectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Farrarons SS; van Bodegraven EA; Sauvanet A; Hilal MA; Besselink MG; Dokmak S
Surgery; 2022 Nov; 172(5):1490-1501. PubMed ID: 35987787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
