BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37486787)

  • 21. Uncovering uncharacterized binding of transcription factors from ATAC-seq footprinting data.
    Schultheis H; Bentsen M; Heger V; Looso M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9275. PubMed ID: 38654130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Asymmetric Conservation within Pairs of Co-Occurred Motifs Mediates Weak Direct Binding of Transcription Factors in ChIP-Seq Data.
    Levitsky V; Oshchepkov D; Zemlyanskaya E; Merkulova T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Aug; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 32825662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A protein activity assay to measure global transcription factor activity reveals determinants of chromatin accessibility.
    Wei B; Jolma A; Sahu B; Orre LM; Zhong F; Zhu F; Kivioja T; Sur I; Lehtiö J; Taipale M; Taipale J
    Nat Biotechnol; 2018 Jul; 36(6):521-529. PubMed ID: 29786094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A conserved role for transcription factor sumoylation in binding-site selection.
    Rosonina E
    Curr Genet; 2019 Dec; 65(6):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 31093693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistics of protein-DNA binding and the total number of binding sites for a transcription factor in the mammalian genome.
    Kuznetsov VA; Singh O; Jenjaroenpun P
    BMC Genomics; 2010 Feb; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 20158869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1.
    Domcke S; Bardet AF; Adrian Ginno P; Hartl D; Burger L; Schübeler D
    Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7583):575-9. PubMed ID: 26675734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. BinDNase: a discriminatory approach for transcription factor binding prediction using DNase I hypersensitivity data.
    Kähärä J; Lähdesmäki H
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2852-9. PubMed ID: 25957350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. G-quadruplexes are transcription factor binding hubs in human chromatin.
    Spiegel J; Cuesta SM; Adhikari S; Hänsel-Hertsch R; Tannahill D; Balasubramanian S
    Genome Biol; 2021 Apr; 22(1):117. PubMed ID: 33892767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors.
    Wang J; Zhuang J; Iyer S; Lin X; Whitfield TW; Greven MC; Pierce BG; Dong X; Kundaje A; Cheng Y; Rando OJ; Birney E; Myers RM; Noble WS; Snyder M; Weng Z
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1798-812. PubMed ID: 22955990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Revealing transcription factor and histone modification co-localization and dynamics across cell lines by integrating ChIP-seq and RNA-seq data.
    Zhang L; Xue G; Liu J; Li Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 10):914. PubMed ID: 30598100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sequence and chromatin determinants of cell-type-specific transcription factor binding.
    Arvey A; Agius P; Noble WS; Leslie C
    Genome Res; 2012 Sep; 22(9):1723-34. PubMed ID: 22955984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chromatin properties of regulatory DNA probed by manipulation of transcription factors.
    Sharov AA; Nishiyama A; Qian Y; Dudekula DB; Longo DL; Schlessinger D; Ko MS
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):569-77. PubMed ID: 24918633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A map of direct TF-DNA interactions in the human genome.
    Gheorghe M; Sandve GK; Khan A; Chèneby J; Ballester B; Mathelier A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Feb; 47(4):e21. PubMed ID: 30517703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
    Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Identification of context-dependent motifs by contrasting ChIP binding data.
    Mason MJ; Plath K; Zhou Q
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Nov; 26(22):2826-32. PubMed ID: 20870645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural network modeling of differential binding between wild-type and mutant CTCF reveals putative binding preferences for zinc fingers 1-2.
    Kaplow IM; Banerjee A; Foo CS
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):295. PubMed ID: 35410161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved linking of motifs to their TFs using domain information.
    Baumgarten N; Schmidt F; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1655-1662. PubMed ID: 31742324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Global dynamics of stage-specific transcription factor binding during thymocyte development.
    Hosoya T; D'Oliveira Albanus R; Hensley J; Myers G; Kyono Y; Kitzman J; Parker SCJ; Engel JD
    Sci Rep; 2018 Apr; 8(1):5605. PubMed ID: 29618724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of DNA Methylation on TFs in Human Embryonic Stem Cells.
    Luo X; Zhang T; Zhai Y; Wang F; Zhang S; Wang G
    Front Genet; 2021; 12():639461. PubMed ID: 33708244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. hTFtarget: A Comprehensive Database for Regulations of Human Transcription Factors and Their Targets.
    Zhang Q; Liu W; Zhang HM; Xie GY; Miao YR; Xia M; Guo AY
    Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 18(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 32858223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.