These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37487138)

  • 1. Broadening the Scope of Binding Free Energy Calculations Using a Separated Topologies Approach.
    Baumann HM; Dybeck E; McClendon CL; Pickard FC; Gapsys V; Pérez-Benito L; Hahn DF; Tresadern G; Mathiowetz AM; Mobley DL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Aug; 19(15):5058-5076. PubMed ID: 37487138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations.
    Cournia Z; Allen B; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Dec; 57(12):2911-2937. PubMed ID: 29243483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical Analysis on the Performance of Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area versus Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations: Bromodomains as a Case Study.
    Aldeghi M; Bodkin MJ; Knapp S; Biggin PC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2017 Sep; 57(9):2203-2221. PubMed ID: 28786670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Large Scale Study of Ligand-Protein Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations: Actionable Predictions from Statistically Robust Protocols.
    Bhati AP; Coveney PV
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2022 Apr; 18(4):2687-2702. PubMed ID: 35293737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of Different Automated Binding Pose Generation Approaches on Relative Binding Free Energy Simulations.
    Cappel D; Jerome S; Hessler G; Matter H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 31986249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accurate Modeling of Scaffold Hopping Transformations in Drug Discovery.
    Wang L; Deng Y; Wu Y; Kim B; LeBard DN; Wandschneider D; Beachy M; Friesner RA; Abel R
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27933808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative Binding Free-Energy Calculations at Lipid-Exposed Sites: Deciphering Hot Spots.
    Dickson CJ; Hornak V; Duca JS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Dec; 61(12):5923-5930. PubMed ID: 34843243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Free energy perturbation (FEP)-guided scaffold hopping.
    Wu D; Zheng X; Liu R; Li Z; Jiang Z; Zhou Q; Huang Y; Wu XN; Zhang C; Huang YY; Luo HB
    Acta Pharm Sin B; 2022 Mar; 12(3):1351-1362. PubMed ID: 35530128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.
    Cappel D; Hall ML; Lenselink EB; Beuming T; Qi J; Bradner J; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2388-2400. PubMed ID: 28024402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Ligands with Diverse Scaffolds with the Alchemical Transfer Method.
    Azimi S; Khuttan S; Wu JZ; Pal RK; Gallicchio E
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Jan; 62(2):309-323. PubMed ID: 34990555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absolute binding free energy calculations improve enrichment of actives in virtual compound screening.
    Feng M; Heinzelmann G; Gilson MK
    Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):13640. PubMed ID: 35948614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scaffold Hopping Transformations Using Auxiliary Restraints for Calculating Accurate Relative Binding Free Energies.
    Zou J; Li Z; Liu S; Peng C; Fang D; Wan X; Lin Z; Lee TS; Raleigh DP; Yang M; Simmerling C
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Jun; 17(6):3710-3726. PubMed ID: 34029468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the Predictive Power of Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations for Test Cases Involving Displacement of Binding Site Water Molecules.
    Wahl J; Smieško M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Feb; 59(2):754-765. PubMed ID: 30640456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to deal with multiple binding poses in alchemical relative protein-ligand binding free energy calculations.
    Kaus JW; Harder E; Lin T; Abel R; McCammon JA; Wang L
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2015 Jun; 11(6):2670-9. PubMed ID: 26085821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining Alchemical Transformation with a Physical Pathway to Accelerate Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations of Charged Ligands to Enclosed Binding Sites.
    Cruz J; Wickstrom L; Yang D; Gallicchio E; Deng N
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Apr; 16(4):2803-2813. PubMed ID: 32101691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separated topologies--a method for relative binding free energy calculations using orientational restraints.
    Rocklin GJ; Mobley DL; Dill KA
    J Chem Phys; 2013 Feb; 138(8):085104. PubMed ID: 23464180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accurate absolute free energies for ligand-protein binding based on non-equilibrium approaches.
    Gapsys V; Yildirim A; Aldeghi M; Khalak Y; van der Spoel D; de Groot BL
    Commun Chem; 2021 May; 4(1):61. PubMed ID: 36697634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation and Design of a Subnanomolar Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-10.
    Li Z; Huang Y; Wu Y; Chen J; Wu D; Zhan CG; Luo HB
    J Med Chem; 2019 Feb; 62(4):2099-2111. PubMed ID: 30689375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Receptor-Ligand Restraint Schemes for Alchemical Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Clark F; Robb G; Cole DJ; Michel J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2023 Jun; 19(12):3686-3704. PubMed ID: 37285579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated, Accurate, and Scalable Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Free-Energy Calculations Using Lambda Dynamics.
    Raman EP; Paul TJ; Hayes RL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7895-7914. PubMed ID: 33201701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.