BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37488399)

  • 1. Time to achievement of minimum clinically important difference after lumbar decompression.
    Nie JW; Federico VP; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Sep; 165(9):2625-2631. PubMed ID: 37488399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meeting Patient Expectations and Achieving a Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability, Back Pain, and Leg Pain May Provide Predictive Utility for Achieving Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Decompression Patients.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Park GJ; Vanjani NN; Prabhu MC; Pawlowski H; Parsons AW; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e328-e335. PubMed ID: 35259504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement in predominant back pain following minimally invasive decompression for spinal stenosis.
    Korsun MK; Shahi P; Shinn DJ; Pajak A; Araghi K; Maayan O; Singh N; Tuma O; Asada T; Singh S; Kim AYE; Mai E; Lu AZ; Sheha E; Dowdell J; Qureshi S; Iyer S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Oct; 39(4):576-582. PubMed ID: 37486867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative Predictors in Patients Undergoing Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jul; 175():e914-e924. PubMed ID: 37080454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Presenting Physical Function on Postoperative Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GA; Gheewala JR; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2023 Feb; 36(1):E6-E13. PubMed ID: 35759781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between muscle health and patient-reported outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy: early results.
    Song J; Araghi K; Dupont MM; Shahi P; Bovonratwet P; Shinn D; Dalal SS; Melissaridou D; Virk SS; Iyer S; Dowdell JE; Sheha ED; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 35671940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of body mass index on PROMIS outcomes following lumbar decompression.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Federico VP; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Jun; 165(6):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 36892729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pain Interference Influence on Postoperative Clinical Trajectory in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Jan; 169():e270-e278. PubMed ID: 36334716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Leg Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Minimum Clinically Important Difference Achievement, and Patient Satisfaction After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Parsons AW; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e1196-e1207. PubMed ID: 36075356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achievement of a Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Back Disability Is a Suitable Predictor of Patient Satisfaction Among Lumbar Fusion Patients.
    Geoghegan CE; Mohan S; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Jadczak CN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e94-e100. PubMed ID: 34023465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists' Classification on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 37(2):E89-E96. PubMed ID: 37941112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Ambulatory Setting for Workers' Compensation Patients Undergoing One-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Review of the Literature.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Oyetayo OO; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Nov; 167():e251-e267. PubMed ID: 35948231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recovery ratios and minimum clinically important difference for clinical outcomes in workers' compensation recipients undergoing MIS-TLIF versus ALIF.
    Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Zheng E; Massel DH; Singh K
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2023 Feb; 165(2):315-323. PubMed ID: 36637505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in Time to Achieve Minimum Clinically Important Difference Between Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Replacement.
    Federico VP; Nie JW; Hartman TJ; Zheng E; Oyetayo OO; MacGregor KR; Massel DH; Sayari AJ; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2023 Aug; 176():e337-e344. PubMed ID: 37230245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Influence of Comorbidity on Postoperative Outcomes Following Lumbar Decompression.
    Nolte MT; Parrish JM; Jenkins NW; Cha EDK; Lynch CP; Mohan S; Geoghegan CE; Jadczak CN; Hrynewycz NM; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(7):E390-E396. PubMed ID: 33560010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Self-Identified Gender on Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Decompression: Cohort-Matched Analysis.
    Jacob KC; Patel MR; Park GJ; Ribot MA; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Apr; 160():e616-e627. PubMed ID: 35108646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-reported Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis.
    Hijji FY; Narain AS; Bohl DD; Yom KH; Kudaravalli KT; Lopez GD; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):E92-E97. PubMed ID: 28538082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Obesity and Workers' Compensation in the Setting of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.
    Patel MR; Jacob KC; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Amin K; Singh K
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e341-e348. PubMed ID: 35490892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.