178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37489026)
1. Storz Medical Lithotripsy Index Predicts Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteric Stones.
Keskin SK; Spencer M; Turney BW
Urol J; 2023 Jul; 20(4):203-207. PubMed ID: 37489026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The New Lithotripsy Index predicts success of shock wave lithotripsy.
Keskin SK; Spencer M; Lovegrove C; Turney BW
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):3049-3053. PubMed ID: 36380209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter.
Elkoushy MA; Hassan JA; Morehouse DD; Anidjar M; Andonian S
Urology; 2011 Oct; 78(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 21550641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new optical coupling control technique and application in SWL.
Lv JL
Urolithiasis; 2016 Nov; 44(6):539-544. PubMed ID: 27025864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ureteral stones: SWL treatment.
Zanetti G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Mar; 83(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 21585162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases.
Badawy AA; Saleem MD; Abolyosr A; Aldahshoury M; Elbadry MS; Abdalla MA; Abuzeid AM
Int Urol Nephrol; 2012 Jun; 44(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 22350835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors predictive of shockwave lithotripsy failure for ureteral stones: why we need to hurry.
Mazzon G; Pavan N; Chiapparrone G; De Concilio B; Trombetta C
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Dec; 71(6):644-650. PubMed ID: 31166100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A new transportable shock-wave lithotripsy machine for managing urinary stones: a single-centre experience with a dual-focus lithotripter.
De Sio M; Autorino R; Quarto G; Mordente S; Giugliano F; Di Giacomo F; Neri F; Quattrone C; Sorrentino D; De Domenico R; D'Armiento M
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1137-41. PubMed ID: 17550410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Supine transgluteal vs prone position in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteric stones.
Kamel M; Salem EA; Maarouf A; Abdalla M; Ragab A; Shahin AM
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 25440820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.
Wu CF; Shee JJ; Lin WY; Lin CL; Chen CS
J Urol; 2004 Nov; 172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. PubMed ID: 15540749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stone fragility: its therapeutic implications in shock wave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract stones.
Ansari MS; Gupta NP; Seth A; Hemal AK; Dogra PN; Singh TP
Int Urol Nephrol; 2003; 35(3):387-92. PubMed ID: 15160546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of bioelectric impedance analysis on the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
Keser F; Culpan M; Cakici MC; Atis RG; Yildirim A
Urolithiasis; 2023 Jul; 51(1):93. PubMed ID: 37400587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel model using computed tomography parameters to predict shock wave lithotripsy success in ureteral stones at different locations.
Akkaş F; Culha MG; Ayten A; Danacıoğlu YO; Yildiz Ö; İnci E; Guner E; Şahin S
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Mar; 46(2):114-121. PubMed ID: 35184987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Ureteroscopic Treatment as Therapeutic Interventions for Stones of the Ureter (TISU): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Non-inferiority Trial.
Dasgupta R; Cameron S; Aucott L; MacLennan G; Thomas RE; Kilonzo MM; Lam TBL; N'Dow J; Norrie J; Anson K; Burgess N; Clark CT; Keeley FX; MacLennan SJ; Starr K; McClinton S
Eur Urol; 2021 Jul; 80(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 33810921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
Chung VY; Turney BW
Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
