These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37489267)

  • 1. Using short-term endpoints to improve interim decision making and trial duration in two-stage phase II trials with nested binary endpoints.
    Zocholl D; Kunz CU; Rauch G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1749-1765. PubMed ID: 37489267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal futility stopping boundaries for binary endpoints.
    Freitag MM; Li X; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):80. PubMed ID: 38539108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An optimal Bayesian predictive probability design for phase II clinical trials with simple and complicated endpoints.
    Guo B; Liu S
    Biom J; 2020 Mar; 62(2):339-349. PubMed ID: 31402481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving interim decisions in randomized trials by exploiting information on short-term endpoints and prognostic baseline covariates.
    Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Sep; 19(5):583-601. PubMed ID: 32248662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating futility of a binary clinical endpoint using early read-outs.
    Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S; De Ridder F
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5361-5375. PubMed ID: 31631357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-stage optimal designs with survival endpoint when the follow-up time is restricted.
    Shan G; Zhang H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):74. PubMed ID: 30943896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
    Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interim analysis incorporating short- and long-term binary endpoints.
    Niewczas J; Kunz CU; König F
    Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):665-687. PubMed ID: 30694566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian two-stage design for phase II oncology trials with binary endpoint.
    Chen L; Pan J; Wu Y; Wang J; Chen F; Zhao J; Chen P
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(12):2291-2301. PubMed ID: 35178729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian enhancement two-stage design for single-arm phase II clinical trials with binary and time-to-event endpoints.
    Shi H; Yin G
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 29466612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-stage phase II oncology designs using short-term endpoints for early stopping.
    Kunz CU; Wason JM; Kieser M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1671-1683. PubMed ID: 26037529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bayesian optimal phase II clinical trial design with time-to-event endpoint.
    Zhou H; Chen C; Sun L; Yuan Y
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):776-786. PubMed ID: 32524679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian decision theoretic two-stage design in phase II clinical trials with survival endpoint.
    Zhao L; Taylor JM; Schuetze SM
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1804-20. PubMed ID: 22359354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian single-to-double arm transition design using both short-term and long-term endpoints.
    Xu T; Shi H; Lin R
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(4):588-604. PubMed ID: 36755420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal decision-making in oncology development programs based on probability of success for phase III utilizing phase II/III data on response and overall survival.
    Götte H; Xiong J; Kirchner M; Demirtas H; Kieser M
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 19(6):861-881. PubMed ID: 32662598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trial monitoring via a futility criterion for interim results on a count data endpoint and a continuous endpoint.
    Quan H; Kang T; Fan C; Lu X; Chen X; Luo X; Wei L
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Apr; 103():106316. PubMed ID: 33571688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation optimization for Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial with binary endpoints.
    Yu Z; Ramakrishnan V; Meinzer C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 30763151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictive probability of success using surrogate endpoints.
    Saint-Hilary G; Barboux V; Pannaux M; Gasparini M; Robert V; Mastrantonio G
    Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(10):1753-1774. PubMed ID: 30548627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomized Bayesian optimal phase II design with binary endpoint.
    Ding Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2023 Mar; 33(2):151-166. PubMed ID: 35793222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sample size reestimation and Bayesian predictive probability for single-arm clinical trials with a time-to-event endpoint using Weibull distribution with unknown shape parameter.
    Waleed M; He J; Phadnis MA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Jul; 34(4):469-487. PubMed ID: 37545144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.