These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37489478)

  • 1. Relationships of Radiation Dose Indices with Body Size Indices in Adult Body Computed Tomography.
    Inoue Y; Itoh H; Nagahara K; Hata H; Mitsui K
    Tomography; 2023 Jul; 9(4):1381-1392. PubMed ID: 37489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Size-specific, scanner-independent organ dose estimates in contiguous axial and helical head CT examinations.
    McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon C; Zankl M; Sepahdari AR; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121909. PubMed ID: 25471969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating size specific dose estimate from computed tomography radiograph localizer with radiation risk assessment.
    Burton CS; Al-Ward S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 24(6):e13989. PubMed ID: 37132289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative Study of Volume Computed Tomography Dose Index and Size-Specific Dose Estimate Head in Computed Tomography Examination for Adult Patients Based on the Mode of Automatic Tube Current Modulation.
    Xu J; He X; Xiao H; Xu J
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Jan; 25():71-76. PubMed ID: 30604739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Application Value of Different Radiation Dose Evaluation Methods in Evaluating Radiation Dose of Adult Thoracic and Abdominal CT Scan.
    He J; Dong G; Deng Y; He J; Xiu Z; Feng F
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():860968. PubMed ID: 35402481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating patient water equivalent diameter from CT localizer images - A longitudinal and multi-institutional study of the stability of calibration parameters.
    Zhang D; Liu X; Duan X; Bankier AA; Rong J; Palmer MR
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2139-2149. PubMed ID: 32086943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local diagnostic reference level based on size-specific dose estimates: assessment of pediatric abdominal/pelvic computed tomography at a Japanese national children's hospital.
    Imai R; Miyazaki O; Horiuchi T; Kurosawa H; Nosaka S
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 25298299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.
    Hardy AJ; Bostani M; McMillan K; Zankl M; McCollough C; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4667-4682. PubMed ID: 30118143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Size specific dose estimation in pediatric CT: preliminary study and conversion factors.
    Zhang J; Zhang X
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 May; 200(7):677-686. PubMed ID: 38678314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation analysis of organ doses determined by Monte Carlo simulation with dose metrics for patients undergoing chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations.
    Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Goto T; Obara S; Ota H; Tsukagoshi S
    Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():1-9. PubMed ID: 32755745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient Size-Specific Analysis of Dose Indexes From CT Lung Cancer Screening.
    Fujii K; McMillan K; Bostani M; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jan; 208(1):144-149. PubMed ID: 27726409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose is not always what it seems: where very misleading values can result from volume CT dose index and dose length product.
    Seibert JA; Boone JM; Wootton-Gorges SL; Lamba R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 24589395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A survey of pediatric CT doses in the Shanghai metropolitan area.
    Lu H; Wang W; Li B; Sun S; Zhang H
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Mar; 39(1):193-207. PubMed ID: 30560805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tailoring CT Dose to Patient Size: Implementation of the Updated 2017 ACR Size-specific Diagnostic Reference Levels.
    Klosterkemper Y; Appel E; Thomas C; Bethge OT; Aissa J; Kröpil P; Antoch G; Boos J
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1624-1631. PubMed ID: 29580788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.
    Turner AC; Zankl M; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Zhang D; Angel E; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1816-25. PubMed ID: 20443504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Size-specific dose estimates of adult, chest computed tomography examinations: Comparison of Chinese and updated 2017 American College of Radiology diagnostic reference levels based on the water-equivalent diameter.
    Hu X; Gou J; Lin W; Zou C; Li W
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257294. PubMed ID: 34516579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors affecting dose-length product of computed tomography component in whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
    Inoue Y; Takahashi K; Miyatake H; Nagahara K; Iwasaki R
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Jun; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35472765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
    Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of topogram-based body size indices for CT dose consideration and scan protocol optimization.
    Li B; Behrman RH; Norbash AM
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3456-65. PubMed ID: 22755725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The feasibility of patient size-corrected, scanner-independent organ dose estimates for abdominal CT exams.
    Turner AC; Zhang D; Khatonabadi M; Zankl M; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):820-9. PubMed ID: 21452719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.