These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37489995)
1. Erratum for: Ecodesign and Operational Strategies to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of MRI for Energy Cost Savings. Woolen SA; Becker AE; Martin AJ; Knoerl R; Lam V; Folsom J; Eusemann C; Hess CP; Deshpande V Radiology; 2023 Jul; 308(1):e239020. PubMed ID: 37489995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecodesign and Operational Strategies to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of MRI for Energy Cost Savings. Woolen SA; Becker AE; Martin AJ; Knoerl R; Lam V; Folsom J; Eusemann C; Hess CP; Deshpande V Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e230441. PubMed ID: 37097133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigation of carbon footprint effect of renewable power plants regarding energy production: A case study of a city in Turkey. Kerem A J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2022 Mar; 72(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 35030055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plant-wide modeling of a metropolitan wastewater treatment plant to reduce energy consumption and carbon footprint. Okan B; Erguder TH; Aksoy A Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16068-16080. PubMed ID: 36175732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating the potential impact of energy-efficient ammonia control on the carbon footprint of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant. Boiocchi R; Bertanza G Water Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 85(5):1673-1687. PubMed ID: 35290239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ecodesign of cosmetic formulae: methodology and application. L'Haridon J; Martz P; Chenéble JC; Campion JF; Colombe L Int J Cosmet Sci; 2018 Apr; 40(2):165-177. PubMed ID: 29405308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-criteria linear model on carbon footprint in vertical farms and its relation to energy demand and operational costs. Manos DP; Xydis G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Nov; 29(52):79331-79342. PubMed ID: 35708813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecodesign approach for pharmaceutical packaging based on Life Cycle Assessment. Bassani F; Rodrigues C; Marques P; Freire F Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 816():151565. PubMed ID: 34762947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Environmental Footprint of Neurosurgery Operations: An Assessment of Waste Streams and the Carbon Footprint. Talibi SS; Scott T; Hussain RA Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 May; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 35627532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunity and marginal abatement cost savings from China's pilot carbon emissions permit trading system: Simulating evidence from the industrial sectors. Xian Y; Wang K; Wei YM; Huang Z J Environ Manage; 2020 Oct; 271():110975. PubMed ID: 32579527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Carbon savings resulting from the cooling effect of green areas: a case study in Beijing. Lin W; Wu T; Zhang C; Yu T Environ Pollut; 2011; 159(8-9):2148-54. PubMed ID: 21444136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dissolved methane recovery from treated sewage in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors: The energy demand, carbon footprint and financial cost. Medeiros DL; Santos CMQD; Ribeiro R; Tommaso G J Environ Manage; 2023 Oct; 343():118258. PubMed ID: 37247549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy auditing and carbon footprint under long-term conservation agriculture-based intensive maize systems with diverse inorganic nitrogen management options. Jat SL; Parihar CM; Singh AK; Kumar B; Choudhary M; Nayak HS; Parihar MD; Parihar N; Meena BR Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 664():659-668. PubMed ID: 30763846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carbon footprint of low-energy buildings in the United Kingdom: Effects of mitigating technological pathways and decarbonization strategies. Norouzi M; Haddad AN; Jiménez L; Hoseinzadeh S; Boer D Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jul; 882():163490. PubMed ID: 37068666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative energy and carbon footprint analysis of biosolids management strategies in water resource recovery facilities. Zhao G; Garrido-Baserba M; Reifsnyder S; Xu JC; Rosso D Sci Total Environ; 2019 May; 665():762-773. PubMed ID: 30790749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wastewater treatment process impact on energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions. Mamais D; Noutsopoulos C; Dimopoulou A; Stasinakis A; Lekkas TD Water Sci Technol; 2015; 71(2):303-8. PubMed ID: 25633956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The carbon footprint of hospital diagnostic imaging in Australia. McAlister S; McGain F; Petersen M; Story D; Charlesworth K; Ison G; Barratt A Lancet Reg Health West Pac; 2022 Jul; 24():100459. PubMed ID: 35538935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Life cycle implications of urban green infrastructure. Spatari S; Yu Z; Montalto FA Environ Pollut; 2011; 159(8-9):2174-9. PubMed ID: 21330022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of Energy Efficiency, Operation Costs, Carbon Footprint and Ecological Footprint with Reverse Osmosis Membranes in Seawater Desalination Plants. Leon F; Ramos A; Perez-Baez SO Membranes (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34677547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The food-energy-water-carbon nexus of the rice-wheat production system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India: An impact of irrigation system, conservational tillage and residue management. Fagodiya RK; Singh A; Singh R; Rani S; Kumar S; Rai AK; Sheoran P; Chandra P; Yadav RK; Sharma PC; Biswas AK; Chaudhari SK Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 860():160428. PubMed ID: 36436645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]