These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37490290)
1. Physician-Investigator, Research Coordinator, and Patient Perspectives on Dual-Role Consent in Oncology: A Qualitative Study. Morain SR; Barlevy D; Joffe S; Largent EA JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2325477. PubMed ID: 37490290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When Is It Ethical for Physician-Investigators to Seek Consent From Their Own Patients? Morain SR; Joffe S; Largent EA Am J Bioeth; 2019 Apr; 19(4):11-18. PubMed ID: 30994425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Qualitative Study into Dependent Relationships and Voluntary Informed Consent for Research in Pediatric Oncology. Dekking SA; van der Graaf R; Schouten-van Meeteren AY; Kars MC; van Delden JJ Paediatr Drugs; 2016 Apr; 18(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 26755349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research. American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the Perceived Acceptability of an Early Enrollment Strategy Using Advance Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia. Corneli A; Perry B; Collyar D; Powers JH; Farley JJ; Calvert SB; Santiago J; Donnelly HK; Swezey T; Dombeck CB; De Anda C; Fowler VG; Holland TL JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e185816. PubMed ID: 30646295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators. Suver CM; Hamann JK; Chin EM; Goldstein FC; Blazel HM; Manzanares CM; Doerr MJ; Asthana SJ; Mangravite LM; Levey AI; Lah JJ; Edwards DF AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):114-124. PubMed ID: 32175821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consensus on Language for Advance Informed Consent in Health Care-Associated Pneumonia Clinical Trials Using a Delphi Process. Corneli A; Calvert SB; Powers JH; Swezey T; Collyar D; Perry B; Farley JJ; Santiago J; Donnelly HK; De Anda C; Blanchard K; Fowler VG; Holland TL JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205435. PubMed ID: 32442291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gatekeeping in cancer clinical trials in Canada: The ethics of recruiting the "ideal" patient. Bell JAH; Kelly MT; Gelmon K; Chi K; Ho A; Rodney P; Balneaves LG Cancer Med; 2020 Jun; 9(12):4107-4113. PubMed ID: 32314549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient Partner Perspectives Regarding Ethically and Clinically Important Aspects of Trial Design in Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trials for Hemodialysis. Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Goldstein CE; Brehaut JC; Weijer C; Zwarenstein M; Dixon S; Grimshaw JM; Garg AX; Taljaard M Can J Kidney Health Dis; 2021; 8():20543581211032818. PubMed ID: 34367647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "A Question of Trust" and "a Leap of Faith"-Study Participants' Perspectives on Consent, Privacy, and Trust in Smart Home Research: Qualitative Study. Kennedy MR; Huxtable R; Birchley G; Ives J; Craddock I JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Nov; 9(11):e25227. PubMed ID: 34842551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public reporting of clinical trial findings as an ethical responsibility to participants: a qualitative study. Morrow RL; Mintzes B; Gray G; Law MR; Garrison S; Dormuth CR BMJ Open; 2023 Mar; 13(3):e068221. PubMed ID: 36944466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study. Kraft SA; Porter KM; Duenas DM; Guerra C; Joseph G; Lee SS; Shipman KJ; Allen J; Eubanks D; Kauffman TL; Lindberg NM; Anderson K; Zepp JM; Gilmore MJ; Mittendorf KF; Shuster E; Muessig KR; Arnold B; Goddard KAB; Wilfond BS AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2021; 12(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 32981477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recruiting terminally ill patients into non-therapeutic oncology studies: views of health professionals. Kleiderman E; Avard D; Black L; Diaz Z; Rousseau C; Knoppers BM BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Dec; 13():33. PubMed ID: 23216847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of individual clinical outcomes on trial participants' perspectives on enrollment in emergency research without consent. Whitesides LW; Baren JM; Biros MH; Fleischman RJ; Govindarajan PR; Jones EB; Pancioli AM; Pentz RD; Scicluna VM; Wright DW; Dickert NW Clin Trials; 2017 Apr; 14(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 28359192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient and Provider Perspectives Regarding Enrollment in Head and Neck Cancer Research. Shuman AG; Gornick MC; Brummel C; Kent M; Spector-Bagdady K; Biddle E; Bradford CR; Brenner JC Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 Jan; 162(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 31818193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study. Parker MJ; de Laat S; Schwartz L BMJ Open; 2016 Sep; 6(9):e012931. PubMed ID: 27625066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suggestions from adolescents, young adults, and parents for improving informed consent in phase 1 pediatric oncology trials. Baker JN; Leek AC; Salas HS; Drotar D; Noll R; Rheingold SR; Kodish ED Cancer; 2013 Dec; 119(23):4154-61. PubMed ID: 24006119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]