These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37490722)
1. Fostering Drivers' Trust in Automated Driving Styles: The Role of Driver Perception of Automated Driving Maneuvers. Ma Z; Zhang Y Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1961-1976. PubMed ID: 37490722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles. Ma Z; Zhang Y Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles. Ma Z; Zhang Y Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):544-561. PubMed ID: 35469464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style. Lee Y; Dong M; Krishnamoorthy V; Akash K; Misu T; Zheng Z; Huang G Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2166-2178. PubMed ID: 37295016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude. Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Driving comfort, enjoyment and acceptance of automated driving - effects of drivers' age and driving style familiarity. Hartwich F; Beggiato M; Krems JF Ergonomics; 2018 Aug; 61(8):1017-1032. PubMed ID: 29451092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Drivers' Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It Both Comfortable and Natural? Peng C; Merat N; Romano R; Hajiseyedjavadi F; Paschalidis E; Wei C; Radhakrishnan V; Solernou A; Forster D; Boer E Hum Factors; 2024 Mar; 66(3):787-806. PubMed ID: 35818335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios. Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Greater prosociality toward other human drivers than autonomous vehicles: Human drivers' discriminatory behavior in mixed traffic. Sun H; Ge Y; Qu W Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107623. PubMed ID: 38735195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior. Jayaraman SK; Creech C; Tilbury DM; Yang XJ; Pradhan AK; Tsui KM; Robert LP Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():117. PubMed ID: 33501132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Take-Over Intention during Conditionally Automated Driving in China: Current Situation and Influencing Factors. Feng Z; Li J; Xu X; Guo A; Huang C; Jiang X Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Driver-initiated take-overs during critical braking maneuvers in automated driving - The role of time headway, traction usage, and trust in automation. Becker S; Brandenburg S; Thüring M Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106725. PubMed ID: 35878555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust. Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style? Manchon JB; Bueno M; Navarro J Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1613-1629. PubMed ID: 34861787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study. Buckley L; Kaye SA; Pradhan AK Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():202-208. PubMed ID: 29631216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving. Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigating the effect of personality on left-turn behaviors in various scenarios to understand the dynamics of driving styles. Fan X; Pan G; Mao Y; He W Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):801-806. PubMed ID: 31725336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of brand and brand trust on initial trust in fully automated driving system. Cui Z; Tu N; Itoh M PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0284654. PubMed ID: 37141217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. User comfort and naturalness of automated driving: The effect of vehicle kinematic and proxemic factors on subjective response. Peng C; Wei C; Solernou A; Hagenzieker M; Merat N Appl Ergon; 2025 Jan; 122():104397. PubMed ID: 39341030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles. Tan X; Zhang Y Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1583-1599. PubMed ID: 36473708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]