BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37491468)

  • 1. Surgically treated cervical cancer in a high-risk group in the era of the 2018 FIGO staging schema: a nationwide study.
    Shigeta S; Shimada M; Tsuji K; Watanabe Z; Tanase Y; Matsuo K; Nakanishi T; Saito T; Aoki D; Mikami M
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):12020. PubMed ID: 37491468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
    Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re-classification of uterine cervical cancer cases treated with radical hysterectomy based on the 2018 FIGO staging system.
    Osaku D; Komatsu H; Okawa M; Iida Y; Sato S; Oishi T; Harada T
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 60(6):1054-1058. PubMed ID: 34794737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Mabuchi S; Okazawa M; Kinose Y; Matsuo K; Fujiwara M; Suzuki O; Morii E; Kamiura S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1389-97. PubMed ID: 22976497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The tumor-stroma ratio is an independent predictor of survival in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following primary radical surgery.
    Zong L; Zhang Q; Kong Y; Yang F; Zhou Y; Yu S; Wu M; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xiang Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):676-681. PubMed ID: 31882242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer: clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic evaluation.
    Kasamatsu T; Onda T; Sawada M; Kato T; Ikeda S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 19398126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Poor prognosis of patients with stage Ib1 adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix with pelvic lymphnode metastasis.
    Yasuda S; Kojima A; Maeno Y; Oki N; Miyahara Y; Sudo T; Takekida S; Yamaguchi S; Nishimura R
    Kobe J Med Sci; 2006; 52(1-2):9-15. PubMed ID: 16547424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic analysis of patients with stage IIIC1p cervical cancer treated by surgery.
    Fan X; Wang Y; Yang N; Zhu P
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jun; 21(1):186. PubMed ID: 37344912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a multi-institutional experience.
    Li J; Ouyang Y; Tao Y; Wang L; Li M; Gao L; Cao X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 31792086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
    Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I-IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Kasamatsu T; Onda T; Sawada M; Kato T; Ikeda S; Sasajima Y; Tsuda H
    Br J Cancer; 2009 May; 100(9):1400-5. PubMed ID: 19401699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of criteria for ovarian preservation in cervical cancer patients treated with radical surgery with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis.
    Hu T; Wu L; Xing H; Yang R; Li X; Huang K; Jia Y; Zhang Q; Chen Z; Wang S; Liu D; Han X; Lin Z; Qu P; Cai H; Song X; Tian X; Wang H; Wang S; Xie X; Li S; Ma D
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):881-90. PubMed ID: 23054110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Para-aortic lymph node involvement revisited in the light of the revised 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.
    Ayhan A; Aslan K; Öz M; Tohma YA; Kuşçu E; Meydanli MM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Sep; 300(3):675-682. PubMed ID: 31263988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
    Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
    Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic value of the 2018 FIGO staging system for cervical cancer patients with surgical risk factors.
    Yan DD; Tang Q; Chen JH; Tu YQ; Lv XJ
    Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():5473-5480. PubMed ID: 31354353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy.
    Hwang WY; Kim JH; Suh DH; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):975-980. PubMed ID: 32467336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
    Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinicopathologic Factors of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Stages IB to IIB.
    Mabuchi Y; Yahata T; Kobayashi A; Tanizaki Y; Shiro M; Ota N; Yagi S; Minami S; Ino K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1677-82. PubMed ID: 26495760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.