These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3749229)

  • 21. Pimozide does not shift palatability: separation of anhedonia from sensorimotor suppression by taste reactivity.
    Peciña S; Berridge KC; Parker LA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1997 Nov; 58(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 9329075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Does pimozide block the reinforcing effect of brain stimulation?
    Gallistel CR; Boytim M; Gomita Y; Klebanoff L
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):769-81. PubMed ID: 7178186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Interpretation of sham feeding data: curve-shift studies.
    Weingarten HP; Duong A; Elston D
    Am J Physiol; 1996 Oct; 271(4 Pt 2):R1009-16. PubMed ID: 8897994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of pimozide on appetitive behavior and locomotor activity: dissimilarity of effects when compared to extinction.
    Spivak KJ; Amit Z
    Physiol Behav; 1986; 36(3):457-63. PubMed ID: 3703975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Failure to obtain functional equivalence between dopamine receptor blockade and extinction: evidence supporting a sensory-motor conditioning hypothesis.
    Tombaugh TN; Szostak C; Voorneveld P; Tombaugh JW
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Jan; 16(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 7058214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differential sensitivity of operant behaviors to changes in the concentration of a sucrose reinforcer: effects of pimozide.
    Vigorito M; Kruse CB; Carretta JC
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1994 Mar; 47(3):515-22. PubMed ID: 8208769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pimozide blocks reinforcement but not priming from MFB stimulation in the rat.
    Wasserman EM; Gomita Y; Gallistel CR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 7178187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of naloxone and pimozide on initiation and maintenance measures of free feeding.
    Wise RA; Raptis L
    Brain Res; 1986 Mar; 368(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 3955365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of the dopamine D1-like receptor antagonist SCH 23390 on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in water-deprived rats licking for water and NaCl solutions.
    Galistu A; D'Aquila PS
    Physiol Behav; 2012 Jan; 105(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 21864553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of chlordiazepoxide on the response to repeated reductions in sucrose concentration in free-fed rats.
    Flaherty CF; Coppotelli C; Potaki J
    Physiol Behav; 1996 Nov; 60(5):1291-8. PubMed ID: 8916184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pimozide does not impair sweetness discrimination.
    Willner P; Papp M; Phillips G; Maleeh M; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1990; 102(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 2274611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of peripheral and central dopamine blockade on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation: evidence for both reward and motor deficits.
    Stellar JR; Kelley AE; Corbett D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1983 Mar; 18(3):433-42. PubMed ID: 6835998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reinforcement value of sucrose measured by progressive ratio operant licking in the rat.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2003 Sep; 79(4-5):663-70. PubMed ID: 12954407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance effects with repeated-response measures during pimozide-produced dopamine receptor blockade.
    Ettenberg A; Cinsavich SA; White N
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1979 Nov; 11(5):557-61. PubMed ID: 531078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pimozide and amphetamine have opposing effects on the reward summation function.
    Gallistel CR; Karras D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1984 Jan; 20(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 6695003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Establishment of secondary reinforcement in sign tracking and place preference tests following pimozide treatment.
    Tombaugh TN; Grandmaison LJ; Zito KA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1982 Oct; 17(4):665-70. PubMed ID: 7178180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of environmental enrichment on extinction and reinstatement of amphetamine self-administration and sucrose-maintained responding.
    Stairs DJ; Klein ED; Bardo MT
    Behav Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 17(7):597-604. PubMed ID: 17021392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feeding behavior in rats is differentially affected by pimozide treatment depending on prior experience.
    Hoffman DC; Beninger RJ
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Feb; 24(2):259-62. PubMed ID: 3952115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of pimozide on positive and negative incentive contrast with rewarding brain stimulation.
    Phillips AG; LePiane FG
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Jun; 24(6):1577-82. PubMed ID: 3737627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dopamine on D2-like receptors "reboosts" dopamine D1-like receptor-mediated behavioural activation in rats licking for sucrose.
    D'Aquila PS
    Neuropharmacology; 2010 Jun; 58(7):1085-96. PubMed ID: 20149807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.