These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37492454)

  • 1. Sphingid caterpillars conspicuous patches do not function as distractive marks or warning against predators.
    Barrone J; Vidal MC; Stevenson R
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10334. PubMed ID: 37492454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pupal Warning Coloration of Three Species of
    Tsubuki M; Hayashi F
    Insects; 2022 Dec; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 36661966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring polymorphism in a palatable prey: predation risk and frequency dependence in relation to distinct levels of conspicuousness.
    Poloni R; Dhennin M; Mappes J; Joron M; Nokelainen O
    Evol Lett; 2024 Jun; 8(3):406-415. PubMed ID: 38818419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perspective: the evolution of warning coloration is not paradoxical.
    Marples NM; Kelly DJ; Thomas RJ
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):933-40. PubMed ID: 16136793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seasonal variations in bird selection pressure on prey colouration.
    Zvereva EL; Kozlov MV
    Oecologia; 2021 Aug; 196(4):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 34322748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conditions for the spread of conspicuous warning signals: a numerical model with novel insights.
    Puurtinen M; Kaitala V
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2246-56. PubMed ID: 17236418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environment-dependent attack rates of cryptic and aposematic butterflies.
    Seymoure BM; Raymundo A; McGraw KJ; Owen McMillan W; Rutowski RL
    Curr Zool; 2018 Oct; 64(5):663-669. PubMed ID: 30323845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does avian conspicuous colouration increase or reduce predation risk?
    Ruiz-Rodríguez M; Avilés JM; Cuervo JJ; Parejo D; Ruano F; Zamora-Muñoz C; Sergio F; López-Jiménez L; Tanferna A; Martín-Vivaldi M
    Oecologia; 2013 Sep; 173(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 23386048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Out in the open: behavior's effect on predation risk and thermoregulation by aposematic caterpillars.
    Nielsen ME; Mappes J
    Behav Ecol; 2020; 31(4):1031-1039. PubMed ID: 32760178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predator mixes and the conspicuousness of aposematic signals.
    Endler JA; Mappes J
    Am Nat; 2004 Apr; 163(4):532-47. PubMed ID: 15122501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predator selection on multicomponent warning signals in an aposematic moth.
    Hämäläinen L; Binns GE; Hart NS; Mappes J; McDonald PG; O'Neill LG; Rowland HM; Umbers KDL; Herberstein ME
    Behav Ecol; 2024; 35(1):arad097. PubMed ID: 38550303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conspicuous animal signals avoid the cost of predation by being intermittent or novel: confirmation in the wild using hundreds of robotic prey.
    Ord TJ; Blazek K; White TE; Das I
    Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jun; 288(1952):20210706. PubMed ID: 34102889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The trade-off between color and size in lizards' conspicuous tails.
    Guidi RDS; São-Pedro VA; da Silva HR; Costa GC; Pessoa DMA
    Behav Processes; 2021 Nov; 192():104496. PubMed ID: 34492324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Warning coloration can be disruptive: aposematic marginal wing patterning in the wood tiger moth.
    Honma A; Mappes J; Valkonen JK
    Ecol Evol; 2015 Nov; 5(21):4863-74. PubMed ID: 26640666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.
    Skelhorn J; Rowe C
    Biol Lett; 2005 Dec; 1(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 17148243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of being toxic to deter predators depends on prey body size.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Ecol; 2016; 27(6):1650-1655. PubMed ID: 28028378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variation in predator species abundance can cause variable selection pressure on warning signaling prey.
    Valkonen JK; Nokelainen O; Niskanen M; Kilpimaa J; Björklund M; Mappes J
    Ecol Evol; 2012 Aug; 2(8):1971-6. PubMed ID: 22957197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anuran predators overcome visual illusion: dazzle coloration does not protect moving prey.
    Zlotnik S; Darnell GM; Bernal XE
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Sep; 21(5):729-733. PubMed ID: 29922864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Macroevolution of protective coloration across caterpillars reflects relationships with host plants.
    Robinson ML; Weber MG; Freedman MG; Jordan E; Ashlock SR; Yonenaga J; Strauss SY
    Proc Biol Sci; 2023 Jan; 290(1991):20222293. PubMed ID: 36651051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.